Compare PepsiCo, Inc. (PEP) vs United States Natural Gas Fund (UNG) Price & Performance
Price performance (Past 24H)
Key statistics
Key statistics
PepsiCo, Inc. vs United States Natural Gas Fund — how do they compare? PepsiCo, Inc. trades at $137.31 (market cap $188.97B), while United States Natural Gas Fund trades at $10.02. The key difference: PepsiCo, Inc. pays a 4.28% dividend while United States Natural Gas Fund pays none. Which is the better fit depends on your goals.
| PEP | UNG | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | $188.97B | — |
Sector | Consumer Staples | Commodities - Energy |
52-Week High | $170.44 | $16.90 |
52-Week Low | $134.95 | $9.63 |
Enterprise Value | $231.47B | — |
Dividend Yield | 4.28% | — |
Aura AI Summary
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
Aura AI Summary
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
PepsiCo (PEP) trades at $138.45, up 0.6% with bearish technical signals but strong fundamentals. The company reported consistent earnings beats in recent quarters with Q3 2026 results pending. Revenue grew to $93.93B in 2025, though net income declined to $8.24B. Analysts maintain a consensus price target of $158.79 with 33% buy ratings. Recent news highlights price adjustments on snack products and sponsorship changes.
PEP offers stable dividend income and moderate growth potential, but faces margin pressure from input costs and competitive pricing. The stock trades below analyst targets with solid cash flow generation, though technical indicators suggest near-term weakness. Key risks include consumer sensitivity to price increases and execution challenges in North American markets.
UNG trades at $10.46, down 0.95% with a bearish technical signal from moving averages. The ETF faces headwinds from high natural gas production and storage levels, though weather-driven demand provides some support. Recent EIA forecasts project record natural gas supply and demand through 2027, creating a mixed fundamental backdrop for this futures-based commodity ETF.
The outlook remains challenged by oversupply concerns, though long-term demand growth from LNG exports and data center power needs offers potential upside. Key risks include commodity price volatility and the structural limitations of futures-based ETFs versus equity-based alternatives like FCG.
Returns comparison
Trailing returns across standard periods
Returns comparison
Trailing returns across standard periods
Top news
Latest headlines on both assets
Top news
Latest headlines on both assets
About PepsiCo, Inc.
PepsiCo is one of the largest food and beverage companies globally. It makes, markets, and sells a slew of brands across the beverage and snack categories, including Pepsi, Mountain Dew, Gatorade, Doritos, Lays, and Ruffles. The firm uses a largely integrated go-to-market model, though it does leverage third-party bottlers, contract manufacturers, and distributors in certain markets. In addition to company-owned trademarks, Pepsi manufactures and distributes other brands through partnerships and joint ventures with companies such as Starbucks. The firm segments its operations into five primary geographies, with North America (comprising Frito-Lay North America, Quaker Foods North America, and North America beverages) constituting around 60% of consolidated revenue.
Read more on PEP →About United States Natural Gas Fund
UNG is a commodity ETF that tracks the daily price movements of natural gas futures. It primarily invests in front-month contracts at the Henry Hub, making it a highly volatile tool for short-term trading rather than long-term holding due to contango and roll costs.
Read more on UNG →
