Compare KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF (KWEB) vs Williams-Sonoma, Inc. (WSM) Price & Performance
Price performance (Past 24H)
Key statistics
Key statistics
KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF vs Williams-Sonoma, Inc. — how do they compare? KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF trades at $27.07, while Williams-Sonoma, Inc. trades at $223.2 (market cap $26.30B). The key difference: Williams-Sonoma, Inc. pays a 1.36% dividend while KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF pays none, and Williams-Sonoma, Inc. is trading nearer its 52-week high, KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF nearer its low. Which is the better fit depends on your goals.
| KWEB | WSM | |
|---|---|---|
Sector | Sector/Thematic | Consumer Cyclical |
52-Week High | $42.94 | $240.06 |
52-Week Low | $23.63 | $168.64 |
Market Cap | — | $26.30B |
Enterprise Value | — | $27.14B |
Dividend Yield | — | 1.36% |
Returns comparison
Trailing returns across standard periods
Returns comparison
Trailing returns across standard periods
Top news
Latest headlines on both assets
Top news
Latest headlines on both assets
About KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF
KWEB tracks the CSI Overseas China Internet Index, providing exposure to Chinese software and services companies listed in the US and Hong Kong, including giants like Tencent, Alibaba, and Meituan.
Read more on KWEB →About Williams-Sonoma, Inc.
With a wide retail and direct-to-consumer presence, Williams-Sonoma is a leader in the $300 billion domestic home category, focused on expanding its exposure in the B2B, marketplace, and franchise areas. Namesake Williams-Sonoma (175 stores) offers high-end cooking essentials, while Pottery Barn (189) provides casual home accessories. Brand extensions include Pottery Barn Kids (52) and PBteen. West Elm (121) is an emerging concept for young professionals, and Rejuvenation (9) offers lighting and house parts. Williams-Sonoma also has a business-to-business team that supports projects that range from residential to large-scale commercial.
Read more on WSM →
