Consolidated Edison, Inc. vs Energy Select Sector SPDR Fund — how do they compare? Consolidated Edison, Inc. trades at $105.89 (market cap $39.20B), while Energy Select Sector SPDR Fund trades at $65.49 (market cap $40.84B). The key difference: Consolidated Edison, Inc. and Energy Select Sector SPDR Fund are close in size by market cap, and Consolidated Edison, Inc. pays a 3.31% dividend while Energy Select Sector SPDR Fund pays none. Which is the better fit depends on your goals — on Pluang, investors hold Consolidated Edison, Inc. for 75 Days and Energy Select Sector SPDR Fund for 67 Days on average.
| ED | XLE | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | $39.20B | $40.84B |
Volume | 2,142,900 | 50,409,268 |
Sector | Utilities | — |
52-Week High | $115.46 | $65.93 |
52-Week Low | $95.37 | $42.61 |
Typical Hold Time | 75 Days | 67 Days |
Enterprise Value | $66.05B | — |
Dividend Yield | 3.31% | — |
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
Consolidated Edison (ED) trades at $104.65, down 0.45% on the day, with a bullish technical signal but mixed earnings history including a recent Q1 2026 miss. The company maintains solid fundamentals with a P/E of 17.43, net income margin of 12.53%, and a $0.89 dividend. Revenue grew to $16.92B in 2025, with cash flow from operations strong at $4.80B. Analyst consensus is a Hold with a $106.33 price target, slightly above the current price.
ED's outlook is stable, supported by its utility business model and dividend aristocrat status, but faces risks from high debt levels and interest expenses. The stock offers income appeal with moderate growth potential, though investor sentiment is cautious amid mixed analyst ratings and institutional selling trends noted in recent filings.
XLE (Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF) trades at $65.46, up 3.28% with strong bullish momentum from moving averages but overbought RSI signals. The ETF faces mixed sentiment as oil prices surge above $100 amid Middle East tensions while futures traders bet on a 12% energy sector decline. Recent news highlights strategic oil reserve concerns and diesel price pressures, creating volatility in energy markets.
Outlook remains volatile with geopolitical risks and Fed policy influencing energy prices. The ETF's 91% oil and gas concentration offers pure energy exposure but amplifies crude price sensitivity. Key risks include oil price reversals and export restrictions, while institutional flows into midstream ETFs suggest defensive positioning within the sector.
Trailing returns across standard periods
What Pluang investors did over the last 30 days
No sentiment data available yet.
Latest headlines on both assets
Con Ed is a holding company for Consolidated Edison of New York, or CECONY, and Orange & Rockland, or O&R. These utilities provide steam, natural gas, and electricity to customers in southeastern New York—including New York City—and small parts of New Jersey. The two utilities will generate nearly all of Con Ed's earnings once it closes the sale of its clean energy business to RWE. Con Ed's clean energy business owns the second-largest portfolio of utility-scale solar projects in the U.S. Following the sale, Con Ed's only non-utility earnings will come from investments in gas and electric transmission.
Read more on ED →In seeking to track the performance of the index, the fund employs a replication strategy. It generally invests substantially all, but at least 95%, of its total assets in the securities comprising the index. The index includes companies that have been identified as energy companies by the GICS®, including securities of companies from the following industries: oil, gas and consumable fuels; and energy equipment and services. It is non-diversified.
Read more on XLE →