Compare Mattel Inc (MAT) vs Northrop Grumman Corporation (NOC) Price & Performance
Price performance (Past 24H)
Key statistics
Key statistics
Mattel Inc vs Northrop Grumman Corporation — how do they compare? Mattel Inc trades at $14.23 (market cap $4.11B), while Northrop Grumman Corporation trades at $509.08 (market cap $74.42B). The key difference: Northrop Grumman Corporation is far larger — about 18.1× Mattel Inc's market cap, and Northrop Grumman Corporation pays a 1.79% dividend while Mattel Inc pays none. Which is the better fit depends on your goals.
| MAT | NOC | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | $4.11B | $74.42B |
Sector | Consumer Cyclical | Industrials |
52-Week High | $22.16 | $768.02 |
52-Week Low | $13.05 | $496.02 |
Enterprise Value | $5.92B | $88.65B |
Dividend Yield | — | 1.79% |
Aura AI Summary
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
Aura AI Summary
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
Mattel (MAT) trades at $14.165, down 0.94% today, with a bullish technical signal supported by moving averages. The stock shows attractive valuation with a P/E of 9.17 and P/S of 0.84, while recent earnings have been mixed with Q1 2026 beating expectations but Q3 and Q4 2025 missing. Revenue remains stable around $5.4B, and the company maintains strong brand collaborations, as seen with recent Hot Wheels and Barbie partnerships.
Outlook is cautiously optimistic given undervaluation and analyst consensus, but risks include stagnant sales, debt levels, and recent negative cash flow trends. The consensus price target is $14.60, suggesting limited upside from current levels, with investor sentiment divided between value opportunity and near-term headwinds.
Northrop Grumman (NOC) trades at $524.14, up 0.49% with a bearish technical signal despite strong fundamentals. The company shows consistent earnings beats, with Q1 2026 EPS of $6.14 exceeding expectations of $6.06. Recent news highlights defense budget optimism and a $312.3M Navy contract for electronic warfare systems. Technical indicators show RSI at oversold levels near support at $518, while moving averages signal bearish momentum.
The investment outlook remains positive with analyst consensus at Buy (57% of 35 analysts) and a $655 price target representing 25% upside. Risks include execution challenges in defense programs and potential margin pressure. Strong cash flow generation and a $96B backlog support long-term growth, though near-term technical weakness may present entry opportunities for patient investors.
Returns comparison
Trailing returns across standard periods
Returns comparison
Trailing returns across standard periods
Top news
Latest headlines on both assets
Top news
Latest headlines on both assets
About Mattel Inc
Mattel markets toy products that are sold to its wholesale customers and direct to retail consumers. The company offers products for children and families, including toys for infants and preschoolers, girls and boys, youth electronics, handheld and other games, puzzles, educational toys, media-driven products, and plush and fashion-related toys. Mattel's owned portfolio includes Barbie, Hot Wheels, Fisher-Price, Thomas & Friends, and American Girl. In addition, it currently manufactures toy products for its segments both internally and externally (through manufacturing partners). Just over half of its net sales are in North America, while the remainder stem from international markets.
Read more on MAT →About Northrop Grumman Corporation
Northrop Grumman is a defense contractor that is diversified across short-cycle and long-cycle businesses. The firm's segments include aeronautics, mission systems, defense services, and space systems. The company's aerospace segment creates the fuselage for the massive F-35 program and produces various piloted and autonomous flight systems. Mission systems creates a variety of sensors and processors for defense hardware. The defense systems segment is a long-range missile manufacturer. Finally, the company's space systems segment produces various space structures, sensors, and satellites.
Read more on NOC →
