Mattel Inc vs Northrop Grumman Corporation — how do they compare? Mattel Inc trades at $15.03 (market cap $4.30B), while Northrop Grumman Corporation trades at $574.85 (market cap $81.78B). The key difference: Northrop Grumman Corporation is far larger — about 19× Mattel Inc's market cap, and Northrop Grumman Corporation pays a 1.63% dividend while Mattel Inc pays none. Which is the better fit depends on your goals.
| MAT | NOC | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | $4.30B | $81.78B |
Sector | Consumer Cyclical | Industrials |
52-Week High | $22.16 | $768.02 |
52-Week Low | $13.05 | $496.02 |
Enterprise Value | $6.52B | $95.77B |
Dividend Yield | — | 1.63% |
Trailing returns across standard periods
Latest headlines on both assets
Mattel markets toy products that are sold to its wholesale customers and direct to retail consumers. The company offers products for children and families, including toys for infants and preschoolers, girls and boys, youth electronics, handheld and other games, puzzles, educational toys, media-driven products, and plush and fashion-related toys. Mattel's owned portfolio includes Barbie, Hot Wheels, Fisher-Price, Thomas & Friends, and American Girl. In addition, it currently manufactures toy products for its segments both internally and externally (through manufacturing partners). Just over half of its net sales are in North America, while the remainder stem from international markets.
Read more on MAT →Northrop Grumman is a defense contractor that is diversified across short-cycle and long-cycle businesses. The firm's segments include aeronautics, mission systems, defense services, and space systems. The company's aerospace segment creates the fuselage for the massive F-35 program and produces various piloted and autonomous flight systems. Mission systems creates a variety of sensors and processors for defense hardware. The defense systems segment is a long-range missile manufacturer. Finally, the company's space systems segment produces various space structures, sensors, and satellites.
Read more on NOC →