Compare Mattel Inc (MAT) vs Monster Beverage Corp (MNST) Price & Performance
Price performance (Past 24H)
Key statistics
Key statistics
Mattel Inc vs Monster Beverage Corp — how do they compare? Mattel Inc trades at $15.05 (market cap $4.21B), while Monster Beverage Corp trades at $45.6 (market cap $89.56B). The key difference: Monster Beverage Corp is far larger — about 21.3× Mattel Inc's market cap, and Monster Beverage Corp is trading nearer its 52-week high, Mattel Inc nearer its low. Which is the better fit depends on your goals.
| MAT | MNST | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | $4.21B | $89.56B |
Sector | Consumer Cyclical | Consumer Staples |
52-Week High | $22.16 | $49.97 |
52-Week Low | $13.05 | $30.86 |
Enterprise Value | $6.44B | $87.85B |
Aura AI Summary
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
Aura AI Summary
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
Mattel (MAT) trades at $14.79, up 2.07% with a bullish technical signal from moving averages. The company reported mixed Q2 2026 results with revenue growth of 10% but an earnings miss due to higher costs. Valuation appears reasonable with P/E of 11.03 and P/S of 0.82, while profitability metrics show strong ROE of 20.5% despite margin pressures from increased advertising expenses.
The stock presents a balanced opportunity with analyst consensus leaning bullish (53% buy ratings) but faces near-term headwinds from cost inflation and discretionary spending pressures. Long-term growth drivers include toy-based entertainment partnerships and digital gaming expansion, though execution risks and market volatility require careful monitoring.
Monster Beverage (MNST) trades at $45.18, down 4.04% in the last 24 hours, with a bearish technical signal. The company reported strong Q2 2026 earnings, beating estimates with $0.60 EPS and record sales of $2.54 billion, driven by international growth. Financials show robust revenue growth from $8.29 billion in 2025 to a projected $9.2 billion in 2026, with net income margins above 23%. A 2-for-1 stock split is scheduled for August 11, 2026.
Outlook remains positive due to consistent earnings beats and global expansion, but high valuation ratios like a P/E of 41.83 pose risks. Analyst consensus is bullish with a $51.14 price target, though competition and economic sensitivity could pressure margins. Investors should weigh growth potential against premium valuation.
Returns comparison
Trailing returns across standard periods
Returns comparison
Trailing returns across standard periods
Top news
Latest headlines on both assets
Top news
Latest headlines on both assets
About Mattel Inc
Mattel markets toy products that are sold to its wholesale customers and direct to retail consumers. The company offers products for children and families, including toys for infants and preschoolers, girls and boys, youth electronics, handheld and other games, puzzles, educational toys, media-driven products, and plush and fashion-related toys. Mattel's owned portfolio includes Barbie, Hot Wheels, Fisher-Price, Thomas & Friends, and American Girl. In addition, it currently manufactures toy products for its segments both internally and externally (through manufacturing partners). Just over half of its net sales are in North America, while the remainder stem from international markets.
Read more on MAT →About Monster Beverage Corp
Monster Beverage is a leader in the energy drink subsegment of the beverage industry. The Monster trademark anchors the portfolio, and notable offerings include Monster Energy and Monster Ultra. The firm has also started to incubate new trademarks for emerging enclaves of the energy space, like Reign in performance energy. It is primarily a brand owner, outsourcing most of its manufacturing processes to third-party copackers. It primarily uses the Coca-Cola bottling system for distribution after a strategic agreement in which Coke became Monster's largest shareholder (nearly 20%) and that also included the exchange of certain businesses between the two firms. Most of Monster's revenue is generated in the United States, though international geographies are increasing in the mix.
Read more on MNST →
