Lenox Pasifik Investama Tbk. vs PP (Persero) Tbk. — how do they compare? Lenox Pasifik Investama Tbk. trades at Rp79 (market cap 181.18B, 76.86M 24h volume), while PP (Persero) Tbk. trades at Rp208 (market cap 1.3T, 7.39M 24h volume). The key difference: PP (Persero) Tbk. is far larger — about 7.2× Lenox Pasifik Investama Tbk.'s market cap, and Lenox Pasifik Investama Tbk. is more actively traded (76.86M versus 7.39M). Which is the better fit depends on your goals.
| LPPS | PTPP | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | 181.18B | 1.3T |
Volume | 76.86M | 7.39M |
Lot | 768.6K | 73.9K |
Turnover | 6.58B | 1.52B |
Average Price | 85.59 | 205.33 |
Value | 6.58B | 1.52B |
Indicative Equilibrium Price | 79 | 208 |
Indicative Equilibrium Volume | 9.22K | 1.72K |
Trailing returns across standard periods
Latest headlines on both assets
PT Lippo Securities Tbk (the Parent Company) was established on June 20, 1989 based on notarial deed No.514 of Misahardi Wilamarta, S.H. The deed of establishment was approved by the Ministry of Justice of the Republic of Indonesia (MOJ) in its decision letter No.C2-6029.HT.01.01TH.89 dated July 6, 1989, and was published in the State of Gazette No.80 Supplement No. 3904 dated October 5, 1990. Its articles of association has been amended several times, most recently by notarial deed No.113 of Ny. Poerbaningsih Asi Warsito, S.H., dated July 30,1999, concerning among others, the adjustments to effect the Regulation No.IX.D.I. On December 20, 1999, the Parent Company submitted a letter to the Chief of the Capital Market Supervisory Board requesting for the revocation of its business license as broker, in connection with the merger of its brokering activities with PT Ciptadana Sekuritas, a subsidiary. This request was approved by the Chief of the Capital Market Supervisory Board based on its decision letter No. 01/PM/2000 dated January 5, 2000.In view of the foregoing, PT Bursa Efek Jakarta in its letter No.S.024/BEJ.ANG/01-2000 dated January 12, 2000 and PT Bursa Efek Surabaya in its letter No. T1-003/AGT/BES/I/2000 dated January 1, 2000, cancelled their Approval Letter on Stock Exchange Membership (Surat Persetujuan Anggota Bursa) issued to the Parent Company effective January 13, 2000 and January 4, 2000, respectively. Accordingly, the Parent Company is required to sell its investments in shares of stock of PT Bursa Efek Jakarta and PT Bursa Efek Surabaya.
Read more on LPPS →PT PP (Persero) was established under the name of NV Pembangunan Perumahan based on the Notarial Deed No. 48 of August 26, 1953. At the time it was established PT PP (Persero) was entrusted to build houses for the officers of PT Semen Gresik Tbk, a subsidiary of BAPINDO in Gresik. Along with increased trust, PT PP (Persero) received the duty to construct large projects that were related to war compensations the Government of Japan paid to the Republic of Indonesia, namely : - Hotel Indonesia, Bali Beach Hotel, - Ambarukmo Palace Hotel and - Samudera Beach Hotel.1960 In compliance to Government Regulation No. 63 year 1960, PN (Perusahaan Negara) Pembangunan Perumahan changed into PN Pembangunan Perumahan. 1962 In 1962, PT PP (Persero) completed the construction of Hotel Indonesia, a 14 stories with 427 rooms, which at the time was the highest building in Indonesia. 1971 In compliance to the Government Regulation No. 39 year 1971, PN Pembangunan Perumahan changed and become PT Pembangunan Perumahan (Persero), which was legalized through the Deed No. 78 dated March 15, 1973. The Company's core business was construction services. 1991-2007 For more than five decades, PT PP (Persero) has been a key player in the national construction business. Several mega projects have been constructed in that period. Subsequently, starting in 1991, PT PP (Persero) diversified its business, including office space rental at Plaza PP and realty business development in the area of Cibubur, and also the establishment of several subsidiaries through partnerships with foreign companies, among others PT PP Taisei Indonesia Construction and PT Mitracipta Polasarana.
Read more on PTPP →