Compare KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF (KWEB) vs Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF (PBW) Price & Performance
Price performance (Past 24H)
Key statistics
Key statistics
KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF vs Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF — how do they compare? KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF trades at $24.93 (market cap $4.37B), while Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF trades at $28.33 (market cap $335.90M). The key difference: KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF is far larger — about 13× Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF's market cap, and Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF is more actively traded (628,890 versus 13,393,361). Which is the better fit depends on your goals — on Pluang, investors hold KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF for 57 Days and Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF for 46 Days on average.
| KWEB | PBW | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | $4.37B | $335.90M |
Volume | 13,393,361 | 628,890 |
Sector | Sector/Thematic | Sector/Thematic |
52-Week High | $41.35 | $46.99 |
52-Week Low | $23.63 | $28.29 |
Typical Hold Time | 57 Days | 46 Days |
Aura AI Summary
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
Aura AI Summary
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
KWEB trades at $24.93, up 2.47% today but maintains a bearish technical outlook with all 13 moving averages signaling sell. The ETF faces headwinds from China's economic challenges including industrial overcapacity and weak domestic consumption. Recent institutional activity shows mixed sentiment with Tidal Investments reducing its stake by 39.1% while HSBC increased its position by 27.7% in recent quarters.
The China internet ETF remains under pressure from geopolitical tensions and economic rebalancing concerns. While corporate profits surged 26% in Q2 2026, ongoing U.S.-China trade dynamics and potential export curbs create uncertainty. Technical indicators suggest continued bearish momentum with key support at $24.
PBW (Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF) trades at $28.33, down 2.04% with a bearish technical signal. The ETF's unique selection criteria prioritize ecological factors over financial metrics, resulting in concentrated exposure to clean energy companies. Recent institutional selling by IFP Advisors (-96.3% position) reflects caution amid sector volatility. Technical indicators show mixed signals with neutral oscillators but bearish moving averages.
Clean energy ETFs face headwinds from oil price volatility and tech sector weakness, though long-term energy transition trends provide growth potential. Key risks include undiversified portfolio concentration, geopolitical energy market impacts, and Federal Reserve policy uncertainty. The ETF's performance remains tied to clean energy adoption rates and government policy support.
Returns comparison
Trailing returns across standard periods
Returns comparison
Trailing returns across standard periods
Investor sentiment on Pluang
What Pluang investors did over the last 30 days
Investor sentiment on Pluang
What Pluang investors did over the last 30 days
No sentiment data available yet.
About KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF
KWEB tracks the CSI Overseas China Internet Index, providing exposure to Chinese software and services companies listed in the US and Hong Kong, including giants like Tencent, Alibaba, and Meituan.
Read more on KWEB →About Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF
PBW is an equal-weighted ETF that invests in U.S. companies leading the clean energy transition. It focuses on renewable energy, power conservation, and sustainable technologies like solar, wind, and energy storage.
Read more on PBW →
