Investment
Features
FeesSafety
Academy
More
Pluang+

Compare KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF (KWEB) vs Otis Worldwide Corp (OTIS) Price & Performance

KraneShares CSI China Internet ETFTrade
Otis Worldwide CorpTrade

Price performance (Past 24H)

Key statistics

KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF vs Otis Worldwide Corp — how do they compare? KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF trades at $24.93 (market cap $4.37B), while Otis Worldwide Corp trades at $65.95 (market cap $25.17B). The key difference: Otis Worldwide Corp is far larger — about 5.8× KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF's market cap, and Otis Worldwide Corp pays a 2.66% dividend while KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF pays none. Which is the better fit depends on your goals — on Pluang, investors hold KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF for 57 Days and Otis Worldwide Corp for 66 Days on average.

KWEBOTIS
Market Cap
$4.37B$25.17B
Volume
13,393,3614,542,442
Sector
Sector/ThematicIndustrials
52-Week High
$41.35$93.62
52-Week Low
$23.63$64.05
Typical Hold Time
57 Days66 Days
Enterprise Value
—$33.20B
Dividend Yield
—2.66%

Aura AI Summary

Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice

KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF

KWEB, the KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF, trades at $24.025, down 1.25% amid bearish technical signals with all 13 moving averages indicating sell pressure. The ETF faces headwinds from China's economic challenges including industrial overcapacity and weak domestic consumption, though recent institutional activity shows mixed positioning with some firms reducing stakes while others increase exposure ahead of potential trade developments.

The outlook remains cautious given China's macroeconomic pressures and ongoing U.S.-China trade tensions, though corporate profits surged 26% in Q2 2026. Key risks include global protectionism against Chinese exports and regulatory uncertainty, while potential trade agreement progress could provide catalysts for the battered Chinese internet sector.

Otis Worldwide Corp

Otis Worldwide trades at $66.11, up 0.56% today but near its 52-week low, with a bearish technical signal and mixed earnings history. The company reported revenue of $14.43B in 2025 with a net income margin of 10.17%, though recent quarters have seen EPS misses. Analyst consensus is split between Buy and Hold, with a price target of $87.00. News highlights margin pressures from China and labor costs, alongside CEO succession plans for 2027.

The outlook is cautious due to near-term margin headwinds and weak equipment demand, but the service segment's growth and dominant market position offer long-term stability. Risks include China exposure and cost inflation, while institutional buying and a discounted valuation present potential upside if execution improves.

Returns comparison

Trailing returns across standard periods

Investor sentiment on Pluang

What Pluang investors did over the last 30 days

KWEB
26% Buy74% Sell
Avg holding period · 57 Days
OTIS

No sentiment data available yet.

Top news

Latest headlines on both assets

About KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF

KWEB tracks the CSI Overseas China Internet Index, providing exposure to Chinese software and services companies listed in the US and Hong Kong, including giants like Tencent, Alibaba, and Meituan.

Read more on KWEB →

About Otis Worldwide Corp

Otis is the largest global elevator and escalator supplier by revenue with around one quarter of share excluding Japan. In 1854 Otis' founder and namesake, Elisha Graves Otis, invented a safety mechanism that prevented elevators from falling if the hoisting cable failed.The company's product and service lifecycle begins with installations of elevator units in new buildings, later selling maintenance services on the units, and eventually replacement of the units after the average 15-20 year useful life of an elevator. As the largest global OEM, over decades Otis has built a base of 2 million elevators under service. Its business model is much the same as that of its competitors Kone, Schindler, and Thyssenkrupp.

Read more on OTIS →