Compare KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF (KWEB) vs Nomura Holdings Inc (NMR) Price & Performance
Price performance (Past 24H)
Key statistics
Key statistics
KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF vs Nomura Holdings Inc — how do they compare? KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF trades at $27.87, while Nomura Holdings Inc trades at $9.8 (market cap $28.46B). The key difference: Nomura Holdings Inc pays a 3.31% dividend while KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF pays none, and Nomura Holdings Inc is trading nearer its 52-week high, KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF nearer its low. Which is the better fit depends on your goals.
| KWEB | NMR | |
|---|---|---|
Sector | Sector/Thematic | Financials |
52-Week High | $42.94 | $10.04 |
52-Week Low | $23.63 | $6.73 |
Market Cap | — | $28.46B |
Dividend Yield | — | 3.31% |
Returns comparison
Trailing returns across standard periods
Returns comparison
Trailing returns across standard periods
About KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF
KWEB tracks the CSI Overseas China Internet Index, providing exposure to Chinese software and services companies listed in the US and Hong Kong, including giants like Tencent, Alibaba, and Meituan.
Read more on KWEB →About Nomura Holdings Inc
Nomura is Japan's largest broker, about twice the size of rival Daiwa Securities and roughly three times the size of the securities units of the three megabanks. It is also the largest asset-management company in Japan, with a similar size differential compared with its rivals. Despite its topnotch brand name in retail broking and asset management in Japan, Nomura has struggled to compete effectively in the institutional securities business against larger global rivals. In 2008, Nomura bought European and Asian assets of the failed Lehman Brothers, which led to a sharply higher cost base but did not provide commensurate revenue. Nomura has reduced the scale of these businesses but maintains its ambition to compete globally with the top players.
Read more on NMR →
