iShares 7-10 Year Treasury Bond ETF vs Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF — how do they compare? iShares 7-10 Year Treasury Bond ETF trades at $89.34 (market cap $41.13B), while Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF trades at $28.16 (market cap $335.90M). The key difference: iShares 7-10 Year Treasury Bond ETF is far larger — about 122.4× Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF's market cap, and Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF is more actively traded (628,890 versus 10,340,382). Which is the better fit depends on your goals — on Pluang, investors hold iShares 7-10 Year Treasury Bond ETF for 108 Days and Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF for 46 Days on average.
| IEF | PBW | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | $41.13B | $335.90M |
Volume | 10,340,382 | 628,890 |
Sector | Fixed Income | Sector/Thematic |
52-Week High | $97.99 | $46.99 |
52-Week Low | $88.92 | $28.29 |
Typical Hold Time | 108 Days | 46 Days |
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
IEF trades at $89.295 with a modest 0.21% daily gain amid a challenging bond market environment. Technical indicators show a bearish trend with moving averages signaling sell pressure, though oscillators remain neutral. Recent Treasury yield volatility and bond market selloffs have created headwinds for fixed income ETFs, while dividend distributions continue with recent payouts around $0.31-0.33 per share.
The outlook remains cautious as rising Treasury yields and inflation concerns pressure bond ETFs. While current yields provide income appeal, further rate increases could depress prices. Investors face the trade-off between defensive positioning and potential capital depreciation if the bond rout continues.
PBW, the Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF, trades at $28.92, down 2.89% today amid a bearish technical signal from moving averages. The ETF's unique selection criteria prioritize ecological factors over financial metrics, resulting in concentrated exposure to the clean energy sector. Recent institutional selling, including a 96.3% reduction by IFP Advisors Inc. in Q2 2026 (SEC filing, September 18, 2026), reflects cautious sentiment despite long-term growth drivers like energy security and data center demand.
Outlook remains challenged by near-term volatility and sector underperformance versus broad markets, though global investment in clean energy offers structural tailwinds. Key risks include oil price swings, Fed policy impacts, and lack of diversification. Investors face a trade-off between speculative growth potential and elevated sensitivity to macroeconomic shifts.
Trailing returns across standard periods
What Pluang investors did over the last 30 days
Latest headlines on both assets
The underlying index measures the performance of public obligations of the US Treasury that have a remaining maturity of greater than or equal to seven years and less than ten years. The fund will invest at least 80% of its assets in the component securities of the underlying index, and the fund will invest at least 90% of its assets in US Treasury securities that the advisor believes will help the fund track the underlying index.
Read more on IEF →PBW is an equal-weighted ETF that invests in U.S. companies leading the clean energy transition. It focuses on renewable energy, power conservation, and sustainable technologies like solar, wind, and energy storage.
Read more on PBW →