Compare iShares 7-10 Year Treasury Bond ETF (IEF) vs Nomura Holdings Inc (NMR) Price & Performance
Price performance (Past 24H)
Key statistics
Key statistics
iShares 7-10 Year Treasury Bond ETF vs Nomura Holdings Inc — how do they compare? iShares 7-10 Year Treasury Bond ETF trades at $89.34 (market cap $41.13B), while Nomura Holdings Inc trades at $9.58 (market cap $27.55B). The key difference: iShares 7-10 Year Treasury Bond ETF is the larger of the two by market cap, and Nomura Holdings Inc pays a 3.4% dividend while iShares 7-10 Year Treasury Bond ETF pays none. Which is the better fit depends on your goals — on Pluang, investors hold iShares 7-10 Year Treasury Bond ETF for 108 Days and Nomura Holdings Inc for 55 Days on average.
| IEF | NMR | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | $41.13B | $27.55B |
Volume | 10,340,382 | 782,470 |
Sector | Fixed Income | Financials |
52-Week High | $97.99 | $10.86 |
52-Week Low | $88.92 | $6.73 |
Typical Hold Time | 108 Days | 55 Days |
Enterprise Value | — | $38.54T |
Dividend Yield | — | 3.4% |
Aura AI Summary
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
Aura AI Summary
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
IEF trades at $89.295 with a modest 0.21% daily gain amid a challenging bond market environment. Technical indicators show a bearish trend with moving averages signaling sell pressure, though oscillators remain neutral. Recent Treasury yield volatility and bond market selloffs have created headwinds for fixed income ETFs, while dividend distributions continue with recent payouts around $0.31-0.33 per share.
The outlook remains cautious as rising Treasury yields and inflation concerns pressure bond ETFs. While current yields provide income appeal, further rate increases could depress prices. Investors face the trade-off between defensive positioning and potential capital depreciation if the bond rout continues.
Nomura Holdings (NMR) trades at $9.53, down 2.56% today amid bearish technical signals. The stock shows mixed fundamentals with strong revenue growth to $1.66T in 2025 and net income margin of 20.4%, but recent earnings misses and negative operating cash flow raise concerns. Valuation appears reasonable with P/E of 11.33 and P/B of 1.15. Analyst sentiment is cautious with 67% hold ratings despite recent Zacks strong buy recommendations.
The outlook remains balanced - attractive valuation and revenue growth potential are offset by cash flow challenges and technical weakness. Key risks include Japan's fiscal policy impacts on bond markets and sustained negative operating cash flow. Investors should weigh the discounted valuation against execution risks in the current macroeconomic environment.
Returns comparison
Trailing returns across standard periods
Returns comparison
Trailing returns across standard periods
Investor sentiment on Pluang
What Pluang investors did over the last 30 days
Investor sentiment on Pluang
What Pluang investors did over the last 30 days
Top news
Latest headlines on both assets
Top news
Latest headlines on both assets
About iShares 7-10 Year Treasury Bond ETF
The underlying index measures the performance of public obligations of the US Treasury that have a remaining maturity of greater than or equal to seven years and less than ten years. The fund will invest at least 80% of its assets in the component securities of the underlying index, and the fund will invest at least 90% of its assets in US Treasury securities that the advisor believes will help the fund track the underlying index.
Read more on IEF →About Nomura Holdings Inc
Nomura is Japan's largest broker, about twice the size of rival Daiwa Securities and roughly three times the size of the securities units of the three megabanks. It is also the largest asset-management company in Japan, with a similar size differential compared with its rivals. Despite its topnotch brand name in retail broking and asset management in Japan, Nomura has struggled to compete effectively in the institutional securities business against larger global rivals. In 2008, Nomura bought European and Asian assets of the failed Lehman Brothers, which led to a sharply higher cost base but did not provide commensurate revenue. Nomura has reduced the scale of these businesses but maintains its ambition to compete globally with the top players.
Read more on NMR →
