iShares Global Clean Energy ETF vs JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF — how do they compare? iShares Global Clean Energy ETF trades at $17.28 (market cap $2.27B), while JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF trades at $61.09 (market cap $44.49B). The key difference: JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF is far larger — about 19.6× iShares Global Clean Energy ETF's market cap, and JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF is trading nearer its 52-week high, iShares Global Clean Energy ETF nearer its low. Which is the better fit depends on your goals — on Pluang, investors hold iShares Global Clean Energy ETF for 87 Days and JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF for 66 Days on average.
| ICLN | JEPQ | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | $2.27B | $44.49B |
Volume | 6,845,064 | 5,681,789 |
52-Week High | $23.75 | $61.46 |
52-Week Low | $15.78 | $53.77 |
Typical Hold Time | 87 Days | 66 Days |
Sector | — | Income / Options Overlay |
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
ICLN trades at $17.12, down 1.1% today, with a bearish technical signal from moving averages and neutral oscillators. The ETF faces volatility compared to traditional energy peers, with a 57.2% maximum drawdown noted in recent analysis. Recent news highlights its 0.38% expense ratio and global clean energy exposure across 105 holdings.
Outlook remains mixed; clean energy benefits from geopolitical shifts boosting renewables demand, but high fees and underperformance versus fossil fuel ETFs pose risks. Investor sentiment is cautious amid sector rotation and competitive pressure from higher-yielding energy alternatives.
JEPQ trades at $60.93, down 0.55% on the day, with a bullish technical signal from moving averages while oscillators remain neutral. The ETF's covered-call strategy generates substantial monthly income, with recent dividends ranging from $0.57 to $0.70 per share. Recent news highlights JEPQ's 11% estimated annual yield and its positioning in AI-driven tech stocks, though the strategy limits upside potential during strong market rallies.
JEPQ offers high income generation through its Nasdaq-focused covered-call approach, making it attractive for retirees seeking monthly cash flow. However, the strategy caps appreciation potential and faces volatility sensitivity, requiring proper portfolio sizing. Key risks include market volatility dependence and competitive pressure from similar income ETFs with different tax treatments.
Trailing returns across standard periods
What Pluang investors did over the last 30 days
Latest headlines on both assets
The index is designed to track the performance of approximately 100 clean energy-related companies. The fund generally invests at least 80% of its assets in the component securities of the target index. The index may invest up to 20% of its assets in certain futures, trading options and swap contracts, cash and cash equivalents, as well as in securities not included in the index. It is non-diversified.
Read more on ICLN →JEPQ seeks to provide monthly income and exposure to the Nasdaq-100 Index with less volatility. It uses a methodology that combines high-growth tech stocks with an options strategy to capture income.
Read more on JEPQ →