Hershey Co vs TeraWulf Inc — how do they compare? Hershey Co trades at $183 (market cap $36.56B), while TeraWulf Inc trades at $17.16 (market cap $8.35B). The key difference: Hershey Co is far larger — about 4.4× TeraWulf Inc's market cap, and Hershey Co pays a 3.19% dividend while TeraWulf Inc pays none. Which is the better fit depends on your goals.
| HSY | WULF | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | $36.56B | $8.35B |
Sector | Consumer Staples | Technology |
52-Week High | $236.28 | $28.98 |
52-Week Low | $162.31 | $5.24 |
Enterprise Value | $41.70B | $10.97B |
Dividend Yield | 3.19% | — |
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
Hershey (HSY) trades at $184.19, up 0.79% with a bullish technical outlook and strong fundamental performance. The stock shows consistent earnings beats with Q2 2026 EPS of $1.90 exceeding expectations by 33%, while revenue growth remains steady at $11.69 billion for 2025. Technical indicators show bullish momentum with the current price near resistance at $184, supported by positive moving average signals. The company maintains robust profitability with 38.38% gross margins and 32.81% ROE, though net income declined to $883 million in 2025 from previous highs.
HSY presents a favorable risk-reward profile with analyst consensus target of $196.78 offering 7% upside potential. Recent margin recovery from favorable cocoa contracts and dividend growth support bullish sentiment, though volume declines and competitive pressures in salty snacks remain concerns. With 68.57% of analysts maintaining Hold ratings, the stock offers steady growth potential but requires monitoring of consumer demand trends and input cost management.
WULF trades at $17.04, up 5.19% on the day amid a broader neocloud infrastructure rally. The stock shows bearish technical signals with 17 sell signals versus 2 buys, while fundamentals reveal significant challenges with a -1,179.94% net income margin and consistent earnings misses. Recent Q2 2026 results showed a $0.37 per share loss versus $0.20 expected, though revenue beat estimates. The company is expanding its high-performance computing capacity with 102 MW operational and 336 MW under construction, supported by a major Anthropic leasing agreement.
Despite unanimous analyst buy ratings and a $38 consensus price target representing 123% upside, WULF faces substantial execution risks and profitability concerns. The transition to AI infrastructure offers long-term potential, but near-term losses and high capital requirements create volatility. Investors should weigh the significant growth opportunity against persistent negative cash flow and competitive pressures in the evolving data center market.
Trailing returns across standard periods
Latest headlines on both assets
Hershey is a leading confectionery manufacturer in the U.S. (around a $25 billion market), controlling around 46% of the domestic chocolate space (per IRI). Beyond its namesake label, the firm's mix has expanded over the last 85 years and now consists of 100 brands, including Reese's, Kit Kat, Kisses, and Ice Breakers. Hershey's products are sold in about 80 countries, albeit with just a high-single-digit percentage of sales coming from markets outside the U.S., including Brazil, India, and Mexico. The firm has sought inorganic opportunities to extend its reach beyond its core confection business, adding Amplify Snack Brands and its Skinny Pop ready-to-eat popcorn to its mix and Pirate Brands (including the Pirate's Booty, Smart Puffs, and Original Tings brands) over the past few years.
Read more on HSY →TeraWulf develops, owns, and operates fully integrated digital infrastructure powered by predominantly zero-carbon energy. It utilizes a hybrid business model that combines industrial-scale Bitcoin mining with high-performance computing (HPC) and AI hosting, leveraging sustainable power sources like nuclear and hydroelectric to deliver low-cost, energy-efficient data center solutions.
Read more on WULF →