Investment
Features
FeesSafety
Academy
More
Pluang+

Compare Gap Inc (GAP) vs PepsiCo, Inc. (PEP) Price & Performance

PepsiCo, Inc.Trade

Price performance (Past 24H)

Key statistics

Gap Inc vs PepsiCo, Inc. — how do they compare? Gap Inc trades at $23.36 (market cap $8.21B), while PepsiCo, Inc. trades at $127.92 (market cap $174.89B). The key difference: PepsiCo, Inc. is far larger — about 21.3× Gap Inc's market cap, and PepsiCo, Inc. pays the higher dividend (4.61%). Which is the better fit depends on your goals — on Pluang, investors hold Gap Inc for 37 Days and PepsiCo, Inc. for 107 Days on average.

GAPPEP
Market Cap
$8.21B$174.89B
Volume
5,192,91723,968,864
Sector
Consumer CyclicalConsumer Staples
52-Week High
$29.13$170.44
52-Week Low
$18.35$123.64
Typical Hold Time
37 Days107 Days
Enterprise Value
$11.44B$215.61B
Dividend Yield
3%4.61%

Aura AI Summary

Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice

Gap Inc

Gap (GAP) trades at $23.61, down 0.76% on the day, with a bullish technical signal from moving averages. The stock shows strong fundamentals with a low P/E of 7.11 and robust profitability, including a 33.78% ROE. Recent earnings beat estimates in Q1 and Q2 2026, and the company is expanding into music partnerships to engage customers. Cash flow from operations remains healthy at $1.49 billion for 2025.

The outlook is positive given Gap's attractive valuation, earnings momentum, and strategic initiatives. Key risks include competitive pressures in retail and reliance on brand revitalization. Analyst consensus is a $25.67 price target, suggesting upside potential, but investors should monitor execution of growth strategies amid economic uncertainties.

PepsiCo, Inc.

PepsiCo (PEP) trades at $123.64, down 1.65% on the day, with a bearish technical signal from moving averages but bullish oscillators. The company has consistently beaten earnings estimates in recent quarters, with Q3 2026 EPS of $2.34 surpassing the $2.29 expectation. Revenue reached $93.93B in 2025, though net income margin dipped to 8.77%. Recent news highlights price cuts on snacks like Doritos to address consumer pushback on high prices.

The outlook is mixed: strong profitability metrics like a 51.59% ROE and a consensus analyst price target of $146.77 suggest upside potential, but competitive pressures and recent net margin compression pose risks. Institutional activity shows mixed signals with some firms increasing stakes while others reduce holdings.

Returns comparison

Trailing returns across standard periods

Investor sentiment on Pluang

What Pluang investors did over the last 30 days

GAP
100% Buy0% Sell
Avg holding period · 37 Days
PEP
72% Buy28% Sell
Avg holding period · 107 Days

Top news

Latest headlines on both assets

About Gap Inc

Gap retails apparel, accessories, and personal-care products under the Gap, Old Navy, Banana Republic, and Athleta brands. Old Navy generates more than half of Gap's sales. The firm also operates e-commerce sites, outlet stores, and specialty stores under various Gap names. Gap operates nearly 3,000 stores in North America, Europe, and Asia and franchises about 600 stores in Asia, Europe, Latin America, and other regions. Gap was founded in 1969 and is based in San Francisco.

Read more on GAP →

About PepsiCo, Inc.

PepsiCo is one of the largest food and beverage companies globally. It makes, markets, and sells a slew of brands across the beverage and snack categories, including Pepsi, Mountain Dew, Gatorade, Doritos, Lays, and Ruffles. The firm uses a largely integrated go-to-market model, though it does leverage third-party bottlers, contract manufacturers, and distributors in certain markets. In addition to company-owned trademarks, Pepsi manufactures and distributes other brands through partnerships and joint ventures with companies such as Starbucks. The firm segments its operations into five primary geographies, with North America (comprising Frito-Lay North America, Quaker Foods North America, and North America beverages) constituting around 60% of consolidated revenue.

Read more on PEP →