Compare Consolidated Edison, Inc. (ED) vs United States Natural Gas Fund (UNG) Price & Performance
Price performance (Past 24H)
Key statistics
Key statistics
Consolidated Edison, Inc. vs United States Natural Gas Fund — how do they compare? Consolidated Edison, Inc. trades at $107.5 (market cap $39.31B), while United States Natural Gas Fund trades at $10.05. The key difference: Consolidated Edison, Inc. pays a 3.3% dividend while United States Natural Gas Fund pays none, and Consolidated Edison, Inc. is trading nearer its 52-week high, United States Natural Gas Fund nearer its low. Which is the better fit depends on your goals.
| ED | UNG | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | $39.31B | — |
Sector | Utilities | Commodities - Energy |
52-Week High | $115.46 | $16.90 |
52-Week Low | $95.37 | $9.63 |
Enterprise Value | $66.16B | — |
Dividend Yield | 3.3% | — |
Aura AI Summary
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
Aura AI Summary
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
Consolidated Edison (ED) trades at $107.98, down 0.89% on the day, with mixed technical signals showing bearish moving averages but neutral oscillators. The utility reported strong Q2 2026 earnings of $0.83 per share, beating estimates, with revenue growth driven by higher electric and gas rates. Analyst consensus remains cautious with 63% hold ratings and a $103.25 price target below current levels. The company maintains stable dividends and benefits from regulated monopoly positioning in New York.
ED offers defensive utility exposure with predictable cash flows and a 3.2% dividend yield, supported by mid-8% rate base growth and 9.4% allowed ROE through 2029. However, high debt levels ($27.3B total debt), capital-intensive grid upgrades, and regulatory risks present challenges. Current valuation at 17.8x P/E appears fair relative to earnings growth, making it suitable for income-focused investors seeking stability amid market volatility.
UNG trades at $9.74, up 1.14% in the last 24 hours, amid bearish technical signals from moving averages and oscillators. The stock lacks key financial ratio data, but news highlights natural gas futures volatility and comparisons with equity-based ETFs like FCG. Recent articles from WSJ and Reuters (June 2026) note steady trading ranges and record supply-demand forecasts from the EIA, influencing sentiment.
Outlook remains cautious due to technical weakness and commodity price dependence. Risks include geopolitical tensions and weather-driven demand shifts. Opportunities may arise from LNG demand growth, but investors face high volatility without clear fundamental anchors from traditional ratios.
Returns comparison
Trailing returns across standard periods
Returns comparison
Trailing returns across standard periods
About Consolidated Edison, Inc.
Con Ed is a holding company for Consolidated Edison of New York, or CECONY, and Orange & Rockland, or O&R. These utilities provide steam, natural gas, and electricity to customers in southeastern New York—including New York City—and small parts of New Jersey. The two utilities will generate nearly all of Con Ed's earnings once it closes the sale of its clean energy business to RWE. Con Ed's clean energy business owns the second-largest portfolio of utility-scale solar projects in the U.S. Following the sale, Con Ed's only non-utility earnings will come from investments in gas and electric transmission.
Read more on ED →About United States Natural Gas Fund
UNG is a commodity ETF that tracks the daily price movements of natural gas futures. It primarily invests in front-month contracts at the Henry Hub, making it a highly volatile tool for short-term trading rather than long-term holding due to contango and roll costs.
Read more on UNG →
