Consolidated Edison, Inc. vs Procter & Gamble Co — how do they compare? Consolidated Edison, Inc. trades at $107.09 (market cap $39.31B), while Procter & Gamble Co trades at $144.52 (market cap $340.39B). The key difference: Procter & Gamble Co is far larger — about 8.7× Consolidated Edison, Inc.'s market cap, and Consolidated Edison, Inc. pays the higher dividend (3.3%). Which is the better fit depends on your goals.
| ED | PG | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | $39.31B | $340.39B |
Sector | Utilities | Consumer Staples |
52-Week High | $115.46 | $167.18 |
52-Week Low | $95.37 | $138.10 |
Enterprise Value | $66.16B | $366.23B |
Dividend Yield | 3.3% | 2.97% |
Volume | — | 6,423,436 |
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
Consolidated Edison (ED) trades at $107.98, down 0.89% on the day, with mixed technical signals showing bearish moving averages but neutral oscillators. The utility reported strong Q2 2026 earnings of $0.83 per share, beating estimates, with revenue growth driven by higher electric and gas rates. Analyst consensus remains cautious with 63% hold ratings and a $103.25 price target below current levels. The company maintains stable dividends and benefits from regulated monopoly positioning in New York.
ED offers defensive utility exposure with predictable cash flows and a 3.2% dividend yield, supported by mid-8% rate base growth and 9.4% allowed ROE through 2029. However, high debt levels ($27.3B total debt), capital-intensive grid upgrades, and regulatory risks present challenges. Current valuation at 17.8x P/E appears fair relative to earnings growth, making it suitable for income-focused investors seeking stability amid market volatility.
Procter & Gamble (PG) trades at $144.77, down 0.69% on the day, with technical indicators showing a bearish trend despite recent earnings beats. The company maintains strong fundamentals with $84.28B revenue, 18.44% net margin, and consistent dividend payments, though valuation multiples remain elevated versus peers. Recent news highlights institutional positioning shifts and the company's new WNBA partnership.
PG offers stable cash flows and dividend growth potential but faces premium valuation concerns and modest revenue growth outlook. Near-term catalysts include Q3 2026 earnings, while risks include competitive pressures and economic sensitivity. Analyst consensus remains positive with a $161.20 price target suggesting 11% upside.
Trailing returns across standard periods
Latest headlines on both assets
Con Ed is a holding company for Consolidated Edison of New York, or CECONY, and Orange & Rockland, or O&R. These utilities provide steam, natural gas, and electricity to customers in southeastern New York—including New York City—and small parts of New Jersey. The two utilities will generate nearly all of Con Ed's earnings once it closes the sale of its clean energy business to RWE. Con Ed's clean energy business owns the second-largest portfolio of utility-scale solar projects in the U.S. Following the sale, Con Ed's only non-utility earnings will come from investments in gas and electric transmission.
Read more on ED →The Procter & Gamble Company manufactures and markets consumer products in countries throughout the world. The Company provides products in the laundry and cleaning, paper, beauty care, food and beverage, and health care segments. Procter & Gamble products are sold primarily through mass merchandisers, grocery stores, membership club stores, drug stores, and neighborhood stores.
Read more on PG →