Consolidated Edison, Inc. vs Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF — how do they compare? Consolidated Edison, Inc. trades at $107.5 (market cap $39.31B), while Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF trades at $34.96. The key difference: Consolidated Edison, Inc. pays a 3.3% dividend while Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF pays none, and Consolidated Edison, Inc. is trading nearer its 52-week high, Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF nearer its low. Which is the better fit depends on your goals.
| ED | PBW | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | $39.31B | — |
Sector | Utilities | Sector/Thematic |
52-Week High | $115.46 | $46.99 |
52-Week Low | $95.37 | $23.73 |
Enterprise Value | $66.16B | — |
Dividend Yield | 3.3% | — |
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
Consolidated Edison (ED) trades at $107.98, down 0.89% on the day, with mixed technical signals showing bearish moving averages but neutral oscillators. The utility reported strong Q2 2026 earnings of $0.83 per share, beating estimates, with revenue growth driven by higher electric and gas rates. Analyst consensus remains cautious with 63% hold ratings and a $103.25 price target below current levels. The company maintains stable dividends and benefits from regulated monopoly positioning in New York.
ED offers defensive utility exposure with predictable cash flows and a 3.2% dividend yield, supported by mid-8% rate base growth and 9.4% allowed ROE through 2029. However, high debt levels ($27.3B total debt), capital-intensive grid upgrades, and regulatory risks present challenges. Current valuation at 17.8x P/E appears fair relative to earnings growth, making it suitable for income-focused investors seeking stability amid market volatility.
PBW trades at $34.81, up 3.48% today, with a neutral technical signal and mixed moving averages. The clean energy ETF shows strength amid sector tailwinds from geopolitical tensions and data center demand, though it faces volatility from interest rate sensitivity. A dividend of $0.24 is scheduled for June 2026, but key valuation ratios like P/E and P/S are unavailable in the data.
The outlook hinges on clean energy adoption trends and Federal Reserve policy, with opportunities in global investment shifts but risks from rate cycles and oil price swings. Analyst sentiment is divided, reflecting the ETF's exposure to macroeconomic factors over company-specific fundamentals.
Trailing returns across standard periods
Con Ed is a holding company for Consolidated Edison of New York, or CECONY, and Orange & Rockland, or O&R. These utilities provide steam, natural gas, and electricity to customers in southeastern New York—including New York City—and small parts of New Jersey. The two utilities will generate nearly all of Con Ed's earnings once it closes the sale of its clean energy business to RWE. Con Ed's clean energy business owns the second-largest portfolio of utility-scale solar projects in the U.S. Following the sale, Con Ed's only non-utility earnings will come from investments in gas and electric transmission.
Read more on ED →PBW is an equal-weighted ETF that invests in U.S. companies leading the clean energy transition. It focuses on renewable energy, power conservation, and sustainable technologies like solar, wind, and energy storage.
Read more on PBW →