Consolidated Edison, Inc. vs Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF — how do they compare? Consolidated Edison, Inc. trades at $106.11 (market cap $38.70B), while Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF trades at $28.29 (market cap $347.46M). The key difference: Consolidated Edison, Inc. is far larger — about 111.4× Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF's market cap, and Consolidated Edison, Inc. pays a 3.36% dividend while Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF pays none. Which is the better fit depends on your goals — on Pluang, investors hold Consolidated Edison, Inc. for 75 Days and Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF for 46 Days on average.
| ED | PBW | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | $38.70B | $347.46M |
Volume | 2,154,810 | 413,698 |
Sector | Utilities | Sector/Thematic |
52-Week High | $115.46 | $46.99 |
52-Week Low | $95.37 | $28.29 |
Typical Hold Time | 75 Days | 46 Days |
Enterprise Value | $65.55B | — |
Dividend Yield | 3.36% | — |
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
ED (Consolidated Edison) trades at $105.99, up 0.83% today, near the consensus price target of $106.33. The stock shows a mixed technical picture with a bullish overall signal but bearish moving averages. Fundamentally, 2025 revenue grew to $16.92B with a net income margin of 12.53%, while recent earnings have been mixed with a Q1 2026 miss. The company maintains a solid dividend, with a recent $0.89 payout announced for September 2026, and is highlighted in news for its economic impact in New York and involvement in electric bus infrastructure.
Outlook is balanced; ED offers stability as a utility stock with consistent dividends and moderate growth, but faces risks from debt levels and interest expenses. Analyst sentiment is cautious with 62.96% hold ratings. Key catalysts include the upcoming investor presentation on October 6, 2026, and execution on capital investments. Risks involve regulatory changes and economic sensitivity.
PBW, the Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF, trades at $28.92, down 2.89% today amid a bearish technical signal from moving averages. The ETF's unique selection criteria prioritize ecological factors over financial metrics, resulting in concentrated exposure to the clean energy sector. Recent institutional selling, including a 96.3% reduction by IFP Advisors Inc. in Q2 2026 (SEC filing, September 18, 2026), reflects cautious sentiment despite long-term growth drivers like energy security and data center demand.
Outlook remains challenged by near-term volatility and sector underperformance versus broad markets, though global investment in clean energy offers structural tailwinds. Key risks include oil price swings, Fed policy impacts, and lack of diversification. Investors face a trade-off between speculative growth potential and elevated sensitivity to macroeconomic shifts.
Trailing returns across standard periods
What Pluang investors did over the last 30 days
No sentiment data available yet.
Con Ed is a holding company for Consolidated Edison of New York, or CECONY, and Orange & Rockland, or O&R. These utilities provide steam, natural gas, and electricity to customers in southeastern New York—including New York City—and small parts of New Jersey. The two utilities will generate nearly all of Con Ed's earnings once it closes the sale of its clean energy business to RWE. Con Ed's clean energy business owns the second-largest portfolio of utility-scale solar projects in the U.S. Following the sale, Con Ed's only non-utility earnings will come from investments in gas and electric transmission.
Read more on ED →PBW is an equal-weighted ETF that invests in U.S. companies leading the clean energy transition. It focuses on renewable energy, power conservation, and sustainable technologies like solar, wind, and energy storage.
Read more on PBW →