Consolidated Edison, Inc. vs Kimberly Clark Corp — how do they compare? Consolidated Edison, Inc. trades at $106.11 (market cap $38.70B), while Kimberly Clark Corp trades at $97.7 (market cap $32.09B). The key difference: Consolidated Edison, Inc. is the larger of the two by market cap, and Kimberly Clark Corp pays the higher dividend (5.31%). Which is the better fit depends on your goals — on Pluang, investors hold Consolidated Edison, Inc. for 75 Days and Kimberly Clark Corp for 93 Days on average.
| ED | KMB | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | $38.70B | $32.09B |
Volume | 2,154,810 | 2,800,459 |
Sector | Utilities | Consumer Staples |
52-Week High | $115.46 | $121.44 |
52-Week Low | $95.37 | $93.05 |
Typical Hold Time | 75 Days | 93 Days |
Enterprise Value | $65.55B | $37.65B |
Dividend Yield | 3.36% | 5.31% |
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
ED (Consolidated Edison) trades at $105.99, up 0.83% today, near the consensus price target of $106.33. The stock shows a mixed technical picture with a bullish overall signal but bearish moving averages. Fundamentally, 2025 revenue grew to $16.92B with a net income margin of 12.53%, while recent earnings have been mixed with a Q1 2026 miss. The company maintains a solid dividend, with a recent $0.89 payout announced for September 2026, and is highlighted in news for its economic impact in New York and involvement in electric bus infrastructure.
Outlook is balanced; ED offers stability as a utility stock with consistent dividends and moderate growth, but faces risks from debt levels and interest expenses. Analyst sentiment is cautious with 62.96% hold ratings. Key catalysts include the upcoming investor presentation on October 6, 2026, and execution on capital investments. Risks involve regulatory changes and economic sensitivity.
Kimberly-Clark (KMB) trades at $97.74, up 1.0% on the day, with a bearish technical signal but strong dividend yield of 5.16%. Recent earnings show a mix of beats and a Q2 2026 miss, while the pending Kenvue acquisition and executive transitions dominate news. The stock is undervalued relative to its consensus price target of $117.25, with a P/E of 19.07 and robust profitability metrics including a net income margin of 11.79%.
KMB offers a high dividend yield and valuation upside, but risks include integration challenges from the Kenvue deal, cash flow pressures, and bearish technical trends. Analyst consensus is cautious with 61% hold ratings, reflecting concerns over execution and sustainability of the dividend amid acquisition-related liabilities.
Trailing returns across standard periods
Latest headlines on both assets
Con Ed is a holding company for Consolidated Edison of New York, or CECONY, and Orange & Rockland, or O&R. These utilities provide steam, natural gas, and electricity to customers in southeastern New York—including New York City—and small parts of New Jersey. The two utilities will generate nearly all of Con Ed's earnings once it closes the sale of its clean energy business to RWE. Con Ed's clean energy business owns the second-largest portfolio of utility-scale solar projects in the U.S. Following the sale, Con Ed's only non-utility earnings will come from investments in gas and electric transmission.
Read more on ED →With around half of sales from personal care and another third from tissue products, Kimberly-Clark sits as a leading manufacturer of tissue and hygiene realm. Its brand mix includes Huggies, Pull-Ups, Kotex, Depend, Kleenex, and Cottonelle. The firm also operates K-C Professional, which partners with businesses to provide safety and sanitary products for the workplace. Kimberly-Clark generates just over of half its sales in North America and more than 10% in Europe, with the rest primarily concentrated in Asia and Latin America.
Read more on KMB →