Consolidated Edison, Inc. vs Illinois Tool Works Inc. — how do they compare? Consolidated Edison, Inc. trades at $106.1 (market cap $39.20B), while Illinois Tool Works Inc. trades at $264.13 (market cap $74.38B). The key difference: Illinois Tool Works Inc. is the larger of the two by market cap, and Consolidated Edison, Inc. pays the higher dividend (3.31%). Which is the better fit depends on your goals — on Pluang, investors hold Consolidated Edison, Inc. for 75 Days and Illinois Tool Works Inc. for 67 Days on average.
| ED | ITW | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | $39.20B | $74.38B |
Volume | 2,142,900 | 1,125,477 |
Sector | Utilities | Industrials |
52-Week High | $115.46 | $299.60 |
52-Week Low | $95.37 | $241.07 |
Typical Hold Time | 75 Days | 67 Days |
Enterprise Value | $66.05B | $83.23B |
Dividend Yield | 3.31% | 2.63% |
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
Consolidated Edison (ED) trades at $106.10, up 1.39% today, with a mixed technical picture showing bullish overall signals but bearish moving averages. The stock's valuation appears reasonable with a P/E of 17.43 and P/S of 2.18, while profitability metrics like a 12.53% net income margin and 8.96% ROE reflect steady utility performance. Recent earnings showed beats in Q4 2025 and Q2 2026 but a miss in Q1 2026, with Q3 2026 results pending. The company maintains strong cash flow from operations of $4.80 billion in 2025 and continues its dividend aristocrat status with a recent $0.89 dividend declaration.
ED offers stable income appeal with a solid dividend history, supported by regulated utility operations and a $24.8 billion economic impact in New York. However, high debt levels ($24.65 billion long-term) and modest growth prospects pose risks. Analyst sentiment is cautious with 62.96% hold ratings, though the consensus price target of $106.33 aligns with the current price, suggesting limited near-term upside amid economic sensitivity.
ITW trades at $264.13, up 1.14% today, with a bearish technical signal but strong fundamentals including a 19.39% net income margin and three consecutive quarterly EPS beats. The stock is supported by a $1.72 quarterly dividend and a consensus price target of $276.86, though analyst ratings are mixed with 21.43% buy, 46.43% hold, and 32.14% sell. Recent news highlights its Dividend King status and institutional buying interest.
The outlook balances robust profitability and dividend reliability against technical weakness and modest revenue growth. Upside potential exists if earnings momentum continues, but risks include high valuation multiples and sector-specific headwinds. The stock presents a hold case for income-focused investors awaiting clearer technical improvement.
Trailing returns across standard periods
What Pluang investors did over the last 30 days
Latest headlines on both assets
Con Ed is a holding company for Consolidated Edison of New York, or CECONY, and Orange & Rockland, or O&R. These utilities provide steam, natural gas, and electricity to customers in southeastern New York—including New York City—and small parts of New Jersey. The two utilities will generate nearly all of Con Ed's earnings once it closes the sale of its clean energy business to RWE. Con Ed's clean energy business owns the second-largest portfolio of utility-scale solar projects in the U.S. Following the sale, Con Ed's only non-utility earnings will come from investments in gas and electric transmission.
Read more on ED →Illinois Tool Works is a diversified global manufacturer that produces specialized industrial equipment, consumables, and related services. The firm operates 87 global divisions through seven distinct operating segments: automotive OEM, construction products, food equipment, specialty products, test/measurement and electronics, polymers and fluids, and welding. About half of its revenue comes from its operations in North America, with the remainder originating from international markets. ITW takes a bottom-up and decentralized approach to portfolio management, with the exception that each segment must apply its 80/20 operating process modeled on the Pareto principle.
Read more on ITW →