Compare Consolidated Edison, Inc. (ED) vs iShares Global Clean Energy ETF (ICLN) Price & Performance
Price performance (Past 24H)
Key statistics
Key statistics
Consolidated Edison, Inc. vs iShares Global Clean Energy ETF — how do they compare? Consolidated Edison, Inc. trades at $107.5 (market cap $39.31B), while iShares Global Clean Energy ETF trades at $18.22. The key difference: Consolidated Edison, Inc. pays a 3.3% dividend while iShares Global Clean Energy ETF pays none, and Consolidated Edison, Inc. is trading nearer its 52-week high, iShares Global Clean Energy ETF nearer its low. Which is the better fit depends on your goals.
| ED | ICLN | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | $39.31B | — |
Sector | Utilities | — |
52-Week High | $115.46 | $23.75 |
52-Week Low | $95.37 | $13.53 |
Enterprise Value | $66.16B | — |
Dividend Yield | 3.3% | — |
Aura AI Summary
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
Aura AI Summary
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
Consolidated Edison (ED) trades at $107.98, down 0.89% on the day, with mixed technical signals showing bearish moving averages but neutral oscillators. The utility reported strong Q2 2026 earnings of $0.83 per share, beating estimates, with revenue growth driven by higher electric and gas rates. Analyst consensus remains cautious with 63% hold ratings and a $103.25 price target below current levels. The company maintains stable dividends and benefits from regulated monopoly positioning in New York.
ED offers defensive utility exposure with predictable cash flows and a 3.2% dividend yield, supported by mid-8% rate base growth and 9.4% allowed ROE through 2029. However, high debt levels ($27.3B total debt), capital-intensive grid upgrades, and regulatory risks present challenges. Current valuation at 17.8x P/E appears fair relative to earnings growth, making it suitable for income-focused investors seeking stability amid market volatility.
ICLN trades at $18.30, up 0.99% today, but technical indicators signal a bearish trend with resistance near $19. The ETF lacks key valuation metrics like P/E and P/S due to its structure, and recent news highlights competition from traditional energy ETFs offering higher yields and lower fees. Clean energy faces policy risks, with stalled U.S. permits threatening investment, though global demand for renewables remains strong.
Outlook is cautious; ICLN offers growth exposure to 105 global clean energy firms but underperforms peers on fees and dividends. Risks include regulatory uncertainty and volatility, while analyst sentiment is mixed amid sector comparisons. Investors should weigh long-term green energy trends against near-term headwinds.
Returns comparison
Trailing returns across standard periods
Returns comparison
Trailing returns across standard periods
About Consolidated Edison, Inc.
Con Ed is a holding company for Consolidated Edison of New York, or CECONY, and Orange & Rockland, or O&R. These utilities provide steam, natural gas, and electricity to customers in southeastern New York—including New York City—and small parts of New Jersey. The two utilities will generate nearly all of Con Ed's earnings once it closes the sale of its clean energy business to RWE. Con Ed's clean energy business owns the second-largest portfolio of utility-scale solar projects in the U.S. Following the sale, Con Ed's only non-utility earnings will come from investments in gas and electric transmission.
Read more on ED →About iShares Global Clean Energy ETF
The index is designed to track the performance of approximately 100 clean energy-related companies. The fund generally invests at least 80% of its assets in the component securities of the target index. The index may invest up to 20% of its assets in certain futures, trading options and swap contracts, cash and cash equivalents, as well as in securities not included in the index. It is non-diversified.
Read more on ICLN →
