Consolidated Edison, Inc. vs General Dynamics Corporation — how do they compare? Consolidated Edison, Inc. trades at $106.11 (market cap $38.70B), while General Dynamics Corporation trades at $331.32 (market cap $88.37B). The key difference: General Dynamics Corporation is far larger — about 2.3× Consolidated Edison, Inc.'s market cap, and Consolidated Edison, Inc. pays the higher dividend (3.36%). Which is the better fit depends on your goals — on Pluang, investors hold Consolidated Edison, Inc. for 75 Days and General Dynamics Corporation for 85 Days on average.
| ED | GD | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | $38.70B | $88.37B |
Volume | 2,154,810 | 1,251,409 |
Sector | Utilities | Industrials |
52-Week High | $115.46 | $395.97 |
52-Week Low | $95.37 | $312.53 |
Typical Hold Time | 75 Days | 85 Days |
Enterprise Value | $65.55B | $93.52B |
Dividend Yield | 3.36% | 1.95% |
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
ED (Consolidated Edison) trades at $105.99, up 0.83% today, near the consensus price target of $106.33. The stock shows a mixed technical picture with a bullish overall signal but bearish moving averages. Fundamentally, 2025 revenue grew to $16.92B with a net income margin of 12.53%, while recent earnings have been mixed with a Q1 2026 miss. The company maintains a solid dividend, with a recent $0.89 payout announced for September 2026, and is highlighted in news for its economic impact in New York and involvement in electric bus infrastructure.
Outlook is balanced; ED offers stability as a utility stock with consistent dividends and moderate growth, but faces risks from debt levels and interest expenses. Analyst sentiment is cautious with 62.96% hold ratings. Key catalysts include the upcoming investor presentation on October 6, 2026, and execution on capital investments. Risks involve regulatory changes and economic sensitivity.
General Dynamics (GD) trades at $329.90, down 0.43% with bearish technical signals despite strong fundamentals. The defense contractor shows consistent revenue growth to $52.55B in 2025 and has beaten earnings estimates for three consecutive quarters. Analyst consensus remains strongly bullish with a $420.57 price target, while technical indicators show oversold conditions with RSI at 11.03.
GD offers solid value with reasonable valuation multiples and strong defense contract visibility, though near-term technical weakness and dependence on government spending create volatility. The stock's 27% upside to consensus target and consistent dividend payments provide attractive total return potential for long-term investors.
Trailing returns across standard periods
Latest headlines on both assets
Con Ed is a holding company for Consolidated Edison of New York, or CECONY, and Orange & Rockland, or O&R. These utilities provide steam, natural gas, and electricity to customers in southeastern New York—including New York City—and small parts of New Jersey. The two utilities will generate nearly all of Con Ed's earnings once it closes the sale of its clean energy business to RWE. Con Ed's clean energy business owns the second-largest portfolio of utility-scale solar projects in the U.S. Following the sale, Con Ed's only non-utility earnings will come from investments in gas and electric transmission.
Read more on ED →General Dynamics is a defense contractor and business jet manufacturer. The firm's segments include aerospace, combat systems, marine, and technologies. The company's aerospace segment creates Gulfstream business jets. Combat system produces land-based combat vehicles, such as the M1 Abrams tank. The marine subsegment creates nuclear-powered submarines, among other things. The technologies segment contains two main units, an IT business that primarily serves the government market and a mission systems business that focuses on products that provide command, control, computers, intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance capabilities to the military.
Read more on GD →