Compare Davita Inc (DVA) vs Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLP) Price & Performance
Price performance (Past 24H)
Key statistics
Key statistics
Davita Inc vs Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR Fund — how do they compare? Davita Inc trades at $175.04 (market cap $11.29B), while Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR Fund trades at $83.05 (market cap $13.50B). The key difference: Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR Fund is the larger of the two by market cap, and Davita Inc is more actively traded (582,204 versus 14,599,953). Which is the better fit depends on your goals — on Pluang, investors hold Davita Inc for 113 Days and Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR Fund for 72 Days on average.
| DVA | XLP | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | $11.29B | $13.50B |
Volume | 582,204 | 14,599,953 |
Sector | Health | — |
52-Week High | $240.96 | $90.00 |
52-Week Low | $103.87 | $75.61 |
Typical Hold Time | 113 Days | 72 Days |
Enterprise Value | $24.01B | — |
Aura AI Summary
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
Aura AI Summary
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
DaVita (DVA) trades at $176.78, down 2.01% today, showing technical bearish signals with price near key support at $175. Fundamentally, the company demonstrates solid earnings performance with three consecutive quarterly beats and attractive valuation metrics including a P/E of 14.98 and P/S of 0.88. Recent expansion of value-based care partnerships with Humana positions the company for continued growth in kidney care services.
The stock presents a compelling value opportunity with analyst consensus target of $235.67 offering 33% upside potential, though investors face risks from regulatory pressures and narrowing profit margins. Warren Buffett's significant ownership (45%) and institutional buying activity provide confidence, but the bearish technical outlook and mixed analyst ratings (43% Buy, 52% Hold) suggest cautious optimism is warranted.
XLP trades at $81.70, showing slight weakness with a 0.09% decline amid bearish technical signals. The ETF maintains strong analyst support with a 100% buy rating from 2 analysts, though technical indicators show moving averages and overall signals are bearish. Recent news highlights XLP's defensive characteristics and competitive expense ratio advantage over peers.
The consumer staples ETF offers defensive exposure during market volatility, supported by positive sector performance in 2026. Key risks include interest rate sensitivity and potential consumer spending slowdowns. Analyst consensus remains bullish despite technical headwinds, positioning XLP as a core defensive holding.
Returns comparison
Trailing returns across standard periods
Returns comparison
Trailing returns across standard periods
Investor sentiment on Pluang
What Pluang investors did over the last 30 days
Investor sentiment on Pluang
What Pluang investors did over the last 30 days
Top news
Latest headlines on both assets
Top news
Latest headlines on both assets
About Davita Inc
DaVita is the largest provider of dialysis services in the United States, boasting market share that eclipses 35% when measured by both patients and clinics. The firm operates over 3,100 facilities worldwide, mostly in the U.S., and treats over 240,000 patients globally each year. Government payers dominate U.S. dialysis reimbursement. DaVita receives approximately 69% of U.S. sales at government (primarily Medicare) reimbursement rates, with the remaining 31% coming from commercial insurers. However, while commercial insurers represented only about 10% of the U.S. patients treated, they represent nearly all of the profits generated by DaVita in the U.S. dialysis business.
Read more on DVA →About Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR Fund
In seeking to track the performance of the index, the fund employs a replication strategy. It generally invests substantially all, but at least 95%, of its total assets in the securities comprising the index. The index includes companies that have been identified as Consumer Staples companies by the GICS®. It is non-diversified.
Read more on XLP →
