Compare Davita Inc (DVA) vs Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM) Price & Performance
Price performance (Past 24H)
Key statistics
Key statistics
Davita Inc vs Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF — how do they compare? Davita Inc trades at $179.05 (market cap $11.29B), while Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF trades at $309.25 (market cap $113.40B). The key difference: Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF is far larger — about 10× Davita Inc's market cap, and Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF is trading nearer its 52-week high, Davita Inc nearer its low. Which is the better fit depends on your goals — on Pluang, investors hold Davita Inc for 114 Days and Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF for 54 Days on average.
| DVA | QQQM | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | $11.29B | $113.40B |
Volume | 582,204 | 2,866,236 |
Sector | Health | Broad Market / Factor |
52-Week High | $240.96 | $312.76 |
52-Week Low | $103.87 | $229.87 |
Typical Hold Time | 114 Days | 54 Days |
Enterprise Value | $24.01B | — |
Aura AI Summary
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
Aura AI Summary
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
DaVita (DVA) trades at $179.25, up 1.4% with strong earnings momentum after beating estimates for three consecutive quarters. The stock shows mixed technical signals with bearish moving averages but neutral oscillators, trading near resistance at $179. Fundamentally, revenue growth continues with 2025 revenue reaching $13.64B, though net margins compressed to 5.47% from 7.3% in 2024. Recent partnership expansion with Humana for value-based kidney care represents significant growth opportunity.
Outlook remains positive with analyst consensus target of $235.67 implying 31% upside, though elevated debt levels and regulatory risks require monitoring. The company benefits from demographic tailwinds in kidney care services and strong institutional support, including Berkshire Hathaway's 45% stake, providing stability amid market volatility.
QQQM trades at $309.39, down 0.84% on the day, with a bullish technical signal from moving averages while oscillators remain neutral. The ETF's lower 0.15% expense ratio compared to QQQ's 0.18% provides a cost advantage, though trading spreads can impact returns. Recent institutional buying includes QRG Capital Management increasing its position by 207.5% during Q2 2026 (SEC filing, September 28, 2026).
The outlook remains positive given the Nasdaq-100's exposure to technology growth stocks, though concentration risk in top holdings and potential tax complications with covered-call alternatives like QQQI warrant caution. Market leadership from small-cap stocks within the index suggests continued momentum, but investors should monitor valuation levels given the current price near resistance at $311.
Returns comparison
Trailing returns across standard periods
Returns comparison
Trailing returns across standard periods
Investor sentiment on Pluang
What Pluang investors did over the last 30 days
Investor sentiment on Pluang
What Pluang investors did over the last 30 days
Top news
Latest headlines on both assets
Top news
Latest headlines on both assets
About Davita Inc
DaVita is the largest provider of dialysis services in the United States, boasting market share that eclipses 35% when measured by both patients and clinics. The firm operates over 3,100 facilities worldwide, mostly in the U.S., and treats over 240,000 patients globally each year. Government payers dominate U.S. dialysis reimbursement. DaVita receives approximately 69% of U.S. sales at government (primarily Medicare) reimbursement rates, with the remaining 31% coming from commercial insurers. However, while commercial insurers represented only about 10% of the U.S. patients treated, they represent nearly all of the profits generated by DaVita in the U.S. dialysis business.
Read more on DVA →About Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF
QQQM is an ETF designed to track the performance of the NASDAQ-100 Index. It provides exposure to the 100 largest non-financial companies listed on the NASDAQ. Positioned as a lower-cost and more long-term-investor-friendly alternative to its peer QQQ, QQQM offers the same fundamental market exposure but typically has a lower share price and is structured to appeal to investors focused on accumulation rather than active trading.
Read more on QQQM →
