Compare Dollar General Corp. (DG) vs New York Times Co (NYT) Price & Performance
Price performance (Past 24H)
Key statistics
Key statistics
Dollar General Corp. vs New York Times Co — how do they compare? Dollar General Corp. trades at $120.19 (market cap $26.49B), while New York Times Co trades at $64.03 (market cap $10.28B). The key difference: Dollar General Corp. is far larger — about 2.6× New York Times Co's market cap, and Dollar General Corp. pays the higher dividend (1.97%). Which is the better fit depends on your goals.
| DG | NYT | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | $26.49B | $10.28B |
Sector | Consumer Staples | Media |
52-Week High | $156.26 | $85.86 |
52-Week Low | $95.94 | $54.66 |
Enterprise Value | $40.93B | $9.67B |
Dividend Yield | 1.97% | 1.44% |
Aura AI Summary
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
Aura AI Summary
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
Dollar General (DG) trades at $119.40, down 2.44% on the day, with a bullish technical signal despite recent weakness. The stock shows strong fundamentals with a P/E of 16.98 and P/S of 0.62, while consistently beating earnings expectations in recent quarters. Revenue growth continues with $40.61B in 2025, though profit margins have compressed from 7.01% in 2022 to 2.77% in 2025. Analyst consensus remains positive with 52% buy ratings and a $128.45 price target, representing 7.6% upside potential.
DG presents a compelling value opportunity with reasonable valuation metrics and consistent earnings beats, though margin compression and competitive pressures pose risks. The stock's current price near support levels combined with positive analyst sentiment suggests potential for recovery, but investors should monitor margin trends and competitive dynamics in the discount retail sector.
The New York Times (NYT) stock trades at $64.21, down 0.91% on the day, with a bearish technical signal despite recent earnings beats. Revenue growth remains steady, reaching $2.82 billion in 2025, with net income margins improving to 12.17%. The company faces headwinds from slowing digital subscriber growth, as highlighted in recent quarterly reports, but maintains strong profitability and cash flow generation.
Outlook is mixed; valuation appears full with a P/E of 26.55, yet analyst consensus targets $77.50 suggest upside. Key risks include subscriber growth moderation and competitive pressures. The stock offers a dividend yield with the next payment scheduled for July 23, 2026.
Returns comparison
Trailing returns across standard periods
Returns comparison
Trailing returns across standard periods
About Dollar General Corp.
A leading American discount retailer, Dollar General operates over 18,000 stores in 47 states, selling branded and private-label products across a wide variety of categories. In fiscal 2021, 77% of net sales came from consumables (including paper and cleaning products, packaged and perishable food, tobacco, and health and beauty items), 12% from seasonal merchandise (such as toys, greeting cards, decorations, and gardening supplies), 7% from home products (for example, kitchen supplies, small appliances, and cookware), and 4% from basic apparel. Stores average roughly 7,400 square feet, and about 75% of Dollar General locations are in towns of 20,000 or fewer people. The firm emphasizes value, with most of its items sold at everyday low prices of $5 or less.
Read more on DG →About New York Times Co
New York Times Co is an American media company known for publishing its flagship newspaper, The New York Times. The company also operates the International New York Times newspaper, as well as digital properties such as nytimes and various smartphone applications. Circulation of The New York Times is the source of revenue for the company, followed by print and digital advertising and its paid digital-only subscription to The New York Times. The company has a daily print circulation of over 500,000 and 1,000,000 on Sundays. The source of growth for The New York Times is its digital subscription service, which has over 1,000,000 paid users.
Read more on NYT →
