Compare Crispr Therapeutics AG (CRSP) vs New York Times Co (NYT) Price & Performance
Price performance (Past 24H)
Key statistics
Key statistics
Crispr Therapeutics AG vs New York Times Co — how do they compare? Crispr Therapeutics AG trades at $50.47 (market cap $4.97B), while New York Times Co trades at $75.36 (market cap $11.81B). The key difference: New York Times Co is far larger — about 2.4× Crispr Therapeutics AG's market cap, and New York Times Co pays a 1.26% dividend while Crispr Therapeutics AG pays none. Which is the better fit depends on your goals.
| CRSP | NYT | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | $4.97B | $11.81B |
Sector | Health | Media |
52-Week High | $76.78 | $85.86 |
52-Week Low | $44.34 | $51.43 |
Enterprise Value | $3.32B | $11.21B |
Dividend Yield | — | 1.26% |
Aura AI Summary
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
Aura AI Summary
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
CRSP trades at $50.63, down 5.1% over 24 hours, amid a bearish technical signal. The company shows deep losses with a net income margin of -56,853.4% in 2025 and negative cash flow from operations. However, analyst consensus remains optimistic with a $74.50 price target, and recent news highlights FDA approval for Casgevy, expanding its gene therapy market.
The outlook hinges on commercial execution of Casgevy and pipeline progress, offering high growth potential in gene editing. Key risks include sustained cash burn, competitive pressures, and regulatory hurdles. Despite current financial challenges, strong analyst buy ratings suggest confidence in long-term value.
The New York Times (NYT) stock trades at $75.04, up 0.11% on the day, with a bullish technical signal from moving averages but neutral oscillators. The company shows strong fundamentals with revenue growth from $2.3B in 2022 to $2.8B in 2025 and net income margin improving to 12.17%. Recent earnings beats and a 29.41% analyst buy rating support positive sentiment, though legal and regulatory pressures from ongoing subpoenas and copyright disputes with OpenAI present near-term risks.
Outlook remains cautiously optimistic with a consensus price target of $78.00, offering ~4% upside. Investment opportunities include consistent earnings growth and defensive stock characteristics amid market volatility. Key risks involve legal overhangs from government subpoenas and AI copyright litigation, which could impact operational focus and financial performance if prolonged.
Returns comparison
Trailing returns across standard periods
Returns comparison
Trailing returns across standard periods
About Crispr Therapeutics AG
CRISPR Therapeutics is a gene editing company focused on the development of CRISPR/Cas9-based therapeutics. CRISPR/Cas9 stands for Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats (CRISPR)/CRISPR-associated protein 9 (Cas9), which is a revolutionary technology for precisely altering specific sequences of genomic DNA. The company is focused on using this technology to treat genetically defined diseases. CRISPR's most advanced pipeline candidate, CTX001, is in collaboration with Vertex Pharmaceuticals and targets sickle cell disease and transfusion-dependent beta-thalassemia, which have high unmet medical needs. The company is progressing additional gene editing programs for immuno-oncology, as well as a stem cell-derived therapy for the treatment of Type 1 diabetes.
Read more on CRSP →About New York Times Co
New York Times Co is an American media company known for publishing its flagship newspaper, The New York Times. The company also operates the International New York Times newspaper, as well as digital properties such as nytimes and various smartphone applications. Circulation of The New York Times is the source of revenue for the company, followed by print and digital advertising and its paid digital-only subscription to The New York Times. The company has a daily print circulation of over 500,000 and 1,000,000 on Sundays. The source of growth for The New York Times is its digital subscription service, which has over 1,000,000 paid users.
Read more on NYT →
