Compare Apple Inc (AAPL) vs Monster Beverage Corp (MNST) Price & Performance
Price performance
Price movement over the last 24 hours
Key statistics
Key statistics
Apple Inc vs Monster Beverage Corp — how do they compare? Apple Inc trades at $314.54 (market cap $4.56T), while Monster Beverage Corp trades at $96 (market cap $94.79B). The key difference: Apple Inc is far larger — about 48.1× Monster Beverage Corp's market cap, and Apple Inc pays a 0.35% dividend while Monster Beverage Corp pays none. Which is the better fit depends on your goals.
| AAPL | MNST | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | $4.56T | $94.79B |
Volume | 100,358,844 | — |
Sector | Technology | Consumer Staples |
52-Week High | $315.20 | $97.64 |
52-Week Low | $202.38 | $58.65 |
Enterprise Value | $4.58T | $93.08B |
Dividend Yield | 0.35% | — |
Aura AI Summary
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
Aura AI Summary
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
Apple (AAPL) trades at $314.13, up 0.47% today, with a bullish technical outlook and strong institutional support. The stock shows robust fundamentals with 2025 revenue of $416.16B and net income of $112.01B, beating earnings estimates in recent quarters. Analyst consensus is bullish with a $329.62 price target, though valuation ratios like P/E of 37.61 and P/B of 42.85 suggest premium pricing. Recent news highlights AI potential via a partnership with Alphabet's Gemini and ongoing retail adjustments.
Outlook remains positive driven by earnings growth and AI integration, but risks include high valuation sensitivity, competitive pressures, and regulatory scrutiny. The stock offers stability with consistent cash flow and dividend payments, yet investors should weigh premium multiples against growth sustainability in a challenging macro environment.
Monster Beverage (MNST) trades at $96.92, down 0.7% on the day, with strong technical momentum indicated by bullish moving averages. The company demonstrates robust fundamentals with revenue growing from $6.3B in 2022 to $8.3B in 2025 and net income reaching $1.91B. Recent earnings have consistently beaten expectations, with Q1 2026 EPS of $0.58 exceeding the $0.527 forecast. Analyst sentiment remains positive with 53% buy ratings, though valuation metrics appear elevated with a P/E of 47.04.
MNST presents growth opportunities through international expansion and product innovation, with overseas sales reaching 45% of revenue. However, the stock faces risks from premium valuation levels and competitive pressures in the energy drink market. The consensus price target of $91.67 suggests potential downside from current levels, while technical indicators show the stock trading near resistance at $98-$100.
Returns comparison
Trailing returns across standard periods
Returns comparison
Trailing returns across standard periods
Top news
Latest headlines on both assets
Top news
Latest headlines on both assets
About Apple Inc
Apple Inc. designs, manufactures, and markets personal computers and related personal computing and mobile communication devices along with a variety of related software, services, peripherals, and networking solutions. Apple sells its products worldwide through its online stores, its retail stores, its direct sales force, third-party wholesalers, and resellers.
Read more on AAPL →About Monster Beverage Corp
Monster Beverage is a leader in the energy drink subsegment of the beverage industry. The Monster trademark anchors the portfolio, and notable offerings include Monster Energy and Monster Ultra. The firm has also started to incubate new trademarks for emerging enclaves of the energy space, like Reign in performance energy. It is primarily a brand owner, outsourcing most of its manufacturing processes to third-party copackers. It primarily uses the Coca-Cola bottling system for distribution after a strategic agreement in which Coke became Monster's largest shareholder (nearly 20%) and that also included the exchange of certain businesses between the two firms. Most of Monster's revenue is generated in the United States, though international geographies are increasing in the mix.
Read more on MNST →
