Compare Yum! Brands, Inc. (YUM) vs ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd (ZIM) Price & Performance
Price performance (Past 24H)
Key statistics
Key statistics
Yum! Brands, Inc. vs ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd — how do they compare? Yum! Brands, Inc. trades at $144.69 (market cap $39.02B), while ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd trades at $29.96 (market cap $3.65B). The key difference: Yum! Brands, Inc. is far larger — about 10.7× ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd's market cap, and ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd pays the higher dividend (20.16%). Which is the better fit depends on your goals — on Pluang, investors hold Yum! Brands, Inc. for 132 Days and ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd for 27 Days on average.
| YUM | ZIM | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | $39.02B | $3.65B |
Volume | 2,597,636 | 1,068,475 |
Sector | Consumer Cyclical | Industrials |
52-Week High | $168.16 | $30.51 |
52-Week Low | $135.77 | $12.44 |
Typical Hold Time | 132 Days | 27 Days |
Enterprise Value | $50.63B | $7.32B |
Dividend Yield | 2.1% | 20.16% |
Aura AI Summary
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
Aura AI Summary
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
YUM trades at $144.82, up 3.18% today, with a bullish technical signal despite mixed indicators. Revenue grew to $8.21B in 2025, with net income of $1.56B and a strong net margin of 25.4%. The company recently sold Pizza Hut for $1.5B and announced a $0.75 dividend, reflecting strategic focus on core brands. Analysts maintain a consensus price target of $170.44, with 39% buy ratings.
YUM presents a stable investment with consistent earnings beats and dividend growth, but faces risks from high debt levels and competitive pressures. Upside is supported by analyst targets and operational efficiency, while macroeconomic headwinds and consumer spending trends pose challenges to sustained growth.
ZIM trades at $29.99, near its 52-week high of $30.96, reflecting strong momentum. The stock shows a bullish technical trend with moving averages supporting upside, while oscillators are neutral. Fundamentally, Q2 2026 earnings beat expectations with EPS of $0.53 versus a forecasted loss, driven by higher freight rates and volumes. Revenue for 2026 is projected at $6.4B with a net income margin of 2.15%. The company faces a pivotal moment with Hapag-Lloyd's acquisition offer under Israeli government review.
The outlook is mixed: operational improvements and record transpacific rates offer upside, but merger uncertainty caps near-term gains. Risks include deal rejection, competitive pressures, and volatile shipping rates. Analysts are cautious, with 67% hold ratings, signaling wait-and-see sentiment amid the acquisition saga.
Returns comparison
Trailing returns across standard periods
Returns comparison
Trailing returns across standard periods
Investor sentiment on Pluang
What Pluang investors did over the last 30 days
Investor sentiment on Pluang
What Pluang investors did over the last 30 days
No sentiment data available yet.
Top news
Latest headlines on both assets
Top news
Latest headlines on both assets
About Yum! Brands, Inc.
Yum Brands is a U.S.-based restaurant operator featuring a portfolio of four brands: KFC (26,930 global units), Pizza Hut (18,380 units), Taco Bell (7,790 units), and The Habit Burger (310 units) at year-end 2021. With $58 billion in 2021 systemwide sales, the firm is the second-largest restaurant company in the world, behind McDonald's ($112.5 billion) but ahead of Restaurant Brands International ($36 billion) and Starbucks ($25 billion). Yum is 98% franchised, with the largest franchisee, Yum China, created via a 2016 spinoff transaction (after which Yum China agreed to pay 3% royalties to Yum Brands in perpetuity). Yum is the newest evolution of Tricon Brands, formerly a division of PepsiCo, and generates the bulk of its revenue from franchise royalties and marketing contributions.
Read more on YUM →About ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd
ZIM is a global container liner shipping company that employs a 'global-niche' strategy, focusing on specific trade lanes where it holds a competitive advantage. Unlike larger, asset-heavy competitors, ZIM operates an agile, charter-intensive fleet, allowing it to rapidly adjust capacity to market demand while prioritizing digitalization and specialized cargo like refrigerated (reefer) goods.
Read more on ZIM →
