Investment
Features
FeesSafety
Academy
More
Pluang+

Compare YieldMax Magnificent 7 Fund of Option Income ETFs (YMAG) vs Yum China Holdings Inc (YUMC) Price & Performance

YieldMax Magnificent 7 Fund of Option Income ETFsTrade
Yum China Holdings IncTrade

Price performance (Past 24H)

Key statistics

YieldMax Magnificent 7 Fund of Option Income ETFs vs Yum China Holdings Inc — how do they compare? YieldMax Magnificent 7 Fund of Option Income ETFs trades at $11.44 (market cap $296.92M), while Yum China Holdings Inc trades at $43.1 (market cap $14.11B). The key difference: Yum China Holdings Inc is far larger — about 47.5× YieldMax Magnificent 7 Fund of Option Income ETFs's market cap, and Yum China Holdings Inc pays a 2.78% dividend while YieldMax Magnificent 7 Fund of Option Income ETFs pays none. Which is the better fit depends on your goals — on Pluang, investors hold YieldMax Magnificent 7 Fund of Option Income ETFs for 62 Days and Yum China Holdings Inc for 77 Days on average.

YMAGYUMC
Market Cap
$296.92M$14.11B
Volume
1,023,5452,350,650
Sector
Income / Options OverlayConsumer Cyclical
52-Week High
$15.68$57.95
52-Week Low
$10.76$39.98
Typical Hold Time
62 Days77 Days
Enterprise Value
—$15.02B
Dividend Yield
—2.78%

Aura AI Summary

Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice

YieldMax Magnificent 7 Fund of Option Income ETFs

YMAG trades at $11.49, down 0.69% with a bullish technical signal supported by moving averages. The ETF maintains consistent weekly dividend distributions, though key valuation ratios remain unavailable. Recent news highlights ongoing distribution announcements and trading activity, with the stock showing moderate volatility within a tight $11-12 range.

The outlook remains cautiously optimistic given the bullish technical setup and income generation through dividends. However, risks include NAV stability concerns during earnings periods and dependency on underlying option strategies. Investors should weigh the high distribution yield against potential capital volatility in market downturns.

Yum China Holdings Inc

YUMC trades at $42.99, up 5.76% today, with a bearish technical signal but strong fundamentals. Recent earnings beats and a 73.68% analyst buy consensus highlight positive momentum. The company completed the Pizza Hut China brand acquisition and expanded its Burger Bar concept, signaling growth initiatives. Cash flow from operations remains robust at $1.47B for 2025, though net cash flow is negative due to financing activities.

The outlook is mixed: solid earnings growth and expansion potential support upside, but technical weakness and competitive pressures pose risks. Investors should weigh the attractive valuation (P/E 15.3) against near-term price volatility and market sentiment headwinds.

Returns comparison

Trailing returns across standard periods

Investor sentiment on Pluang

What Pluang investors did over the last 30 days

YMAG
35% Buy65% Sell
Avg holding period · 62 Days
YUMC
39% Buy61% Sell
Avg holding period · 77 Days

About YieldMax Magnificent 7 Fund of Option Income ETFs

YMAG is an actively managed 'fund of funds' that provides equal-weighted exposure to the seven YieldMax ETFs tracking the 'Magnificent 7' tech giants (Apple, Microsoft, Alphabet, Amazon, Nvidia, Meta, and Tesla). It seeks to generate high current income by harvesting option premiums across these leaders, offering a streamlined way to access concentrated tech volatility in an income-producing format.

Read more on YMAG →

About Yum China Holdings Inc

With almost 10,600 units and USD 9.5 billion in systemwide sales in 2020, Yum China is the largest restaurant chain in China. It generates revenue through its own restaurants and franchise fees. Key concepts include KFC (7,166 units) and Pizza Hut (2,355), but the company's portfolio also includes other brands such as Little Sheep, East Dawning, Taco Bell, Huang Ji Huang, COFFii & Joy, and Lavazza (collectively representing about 985 units). Yum China is a trademark licensee of Yum Brands, paying 3% of total systemwide sales to the company it separated from in October 2016.

Read more on YUMC →