Vital Farms Inc vs Yum! Brands, Inc. — how do they compare? Vital Farms Inc trades at $11.45 (market cap $496.50M), while Yum! Brands, Inc. trades at $144.74 (market cap $39.50B). The key difference: Yum! Brands, Inc. is far larger — about 79.6× Vital Farms Inc's market cap, and Yum! Brands, Inc. pays a 2.07% dividend while Vital Farms Inc pays none. Which is the better fit depends on your goals.
| VITL | YUM | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | $496.50M | $39.50B |
Sector | Consumer Staples | Consumer Cyclical |
52-Week High | $52.41 | $168.16 |
52-Week Low | $8.28 | $138.21 |
Enterprise Value | $583.51M | $51.10B |
Dividend Yield | — | 2.07% |
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
VITL trades at $11.48, up 1.95% on the day, but faces significant technical headwinds with a bearish moving average signal. The company reported mixed Q2 2026 results, beating revenue estimates but posting a $0.47 per share loss amid industry oversupply challenges. Recent $125 million term loan financing provides liquidity support during this transitional period.
While analyst consensus remains positive with a $13.00 price target, near-term risks include margin compression from elevated costs and competitive pricing pressures. The stock's attractive P/S ratio of 0.67 offers value potential if the company can navigate current industry headwinds and return to profitability.
YUM trades at $150.15, up 3.32% in the past 24 hours, with a bearish technical signal from moving averages but neutral oscillators. Recent earnings show a Q2 2026 beat with EPS of $1.62 versus $1.57 expected, while revenue grew to $8.21B in 2025. The company completed the sale of Pizza Hut China for $1.2B in August 2026, aiming to streamline operations and reduce debt. Cash flow from operations improved to $2.01B in 2025, supporting a dividend payment of $0.75 per share.
The outlook is mixed, with analyst consensus leaning hold (56.87%) but a price target of $174.60 implying 16% upside. Risks include ongoing legal investigations and a parasite outbreak impacting Taco Bell sales, though management reports recovery. Debt remains high at $11.25B long-term, but the debt-to-asset ratio improved to 143.49 in 2025. Execution on digital growth and brand focus post-Pizza Hut sale are key to unlocking value.
Trailing returns across standard periods
Latest headlines on both assets
Vital Farms is a leading provider of ethically produced, pasture-raised eggs and butter in the United States. Operating as a Public Benefit Corporation, it manages a network of over 650 family farms to deliver high-welfare food products. It leverages a scalable 'asset-light' partnership model that prioritizes transparency and animal welfare to meet the growing consumer demand for clean-label and sustainable food sources.
Read more on VITL →Yum Brands is a U.S.-based restaurant operator featuring a portfolio of four brands: KFC (26,930 global units), Pizza Hut (18,380 units), Taco Bell (7,790 units), and The Habit Burger (310 units) at year-end 2021. With $58 billion in 2021 systemwide sales, the firm is the second-largest restaurant company in the world, behind McDonald's ($112.5 billion) but ahead of Restaurant Brands International ($36 billion) and Starbucks ($25 billion). Yum is 98% franchised, with the largest franchisee, Yum China, created via a 2016 spinoff transaction (after which Yum China agreed to pay 3% royalties to Yum Brands in perpetuity). Yum is the newest evolution of Tricon Brands, formerly a division of PepsiCo, and generates the bulk of its revenue from franchise royalties and marketing contributions.
Read more on YUM →