Compare United States Natural Gas Fund (UNG) vs Materials Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLB) Price & Performance
Price performance (Past 24H)
Key statistics
Key statistics
United States Natural Gas Fund vs Materials Select Sector SPDR Fund — how do they compare? United States Natural Gas Fund trades at $11.1 (market cap $517.27M), while Materials Select Sector SPDR Fund trades at $49.54 (market cap $7.73B). The key difference: Materials Select Sector SPDR Fund is far larger — about 14.9× United States Natural Gas Fund's market cap, and Materials Select Sector SPDR Fund is trading nearer its 52-week high, United States Natural Gas Fund nearer its low. Which is the better fit depends on your goals — on Pluang, investors hold United States Natural Gas Fund for 22 Days and Materials Select Sector SPDR Fund for 70 Days on average.
| UNG | XLB | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | $517.27M | $7.73B |
Volume | 29,485,537 | 13,681,146 |
Sector | Commodities - Energy | — |
52-Week High | $16.90 | $53.67 |
52-Week Low | $9.63 | $42.23 |
Typical Hold Time | 22 Days | 70 Days |
Aura AI Summary
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
Aura AI Summary
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
UNG trades at $11.06, up 0.28% with a bullish technical signal from moving averages. The fund reported $65.15M net income for 2024 despite zero revenue, with strong total assets of $790.02M and minimal debt. Recent news highlights natural gas market volatility with record production and geopolitical tensions influencing energy prices.
The outlook is mixed: technical strength and clean balance sheet support stability, but zero revenue and negative cash flow (-$251.70M) pose fundamental risks. Investors face exposure to natural gas price swings and supply-demand imbalances, requiring careful monitoring of energy market developments.
XLB trades at $49.49, up 1.04% with a bearish technical signal from moving averages. The materials ETF shows neutral oscillators but faces selling pressure with ADX indicators signaling strong trends. Recent news highlights sector concentration risks with chemicals comprising 49% of assets, while infrastructure and manufacturing trends provide support. The ETF remains below its 200-day moving average of $50.93, indicating technical weakness.
Outlook remains cautious as materials sector faces cyclical headwinds with limited upside after recent rebound. Investment opportunity exists in AI-resistant businesses and infrastructure exposure, but risks include heavy concentration in chemicals and moderate overvaluation in construction materials. Wall Street sentiment appears mixed with some analysts viewing current levels as fully valued.
Returns comparison
Trailing returns across standard periods
Returns comparison
Trailing returns across standard periods
Investor sentiment on Pluang
What Pluang investors did over the last 30 days
Investor sentiment on Pluang
What Pluang investors did over the last 30 days
About United States Natural Gas Fund
UNG is a commodity ETF that tracks the daily price movements of natural gas futures. It primarily invests in front-month contracts at the Henry Hub, making it a highly volatile tool for short-term trading rather than long-term holding due to contango and roll costs.
Read more on UNG →About Materials Select Sector SPDR Fund
In seeking to track the performance of the index, the fund employs a replication strategy. It generally invests substantially all, but at least 95%, of its total assets in the securities comprising the index. The index includes securities of companies from the following industries: chemicals; metals and mining; paper and forest products; containers and packaging; and construction materials. The fund is non-diversified.
Read more on XLB →
