Compare United States Natural Gas Fund (UNG) vs Waste Management, Inc. (WM) Price & Performance
Price performance (Past 24H)
Key statistics
Key statistics
United States Natural Gas Fund vs Waste Management, Inc. — how do they compare? United States Natural Gas Fund trades at $10.02, while Waste Management, Inc. trades at $217.2 (market cap $87.05B). The key difference: Waste Management, Inc. pays a 1.74% dividend while United States Natural Gas Fund pays none, and Waste Management, Inc. is trading nearer its 52-week high, United States Natural Gas Fund nearer its low. Which is the better fit depends on your goals.
| UNG | WM | |
|---|---|---|
Sector | Commodities - Energy | Industrials |
52-Week High | $16.90 | $246.51 |
52-Week Low | $9.63 | $196.77 |
Market Cap | — | $87.05B |
Enterprise Value | — | $109.85B |
Dividend Yield | — | 1.74% |
Aura AI Summary
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
Aura AI Summary
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
UNG trades at $10.46, down 0.95% with a bearish technical signal from moving averages. The ETF faces headwinds from high natural gas production and storage levels, though weather-driven demand provides some support. Recent EIA forecasts project record natural gas supply and demand through 2027, creating a mixed fundamental backdrop for this futures-based commodity ETF.
The outlook remains challenged by oversupply concerns, though long-term demand growth from LNG exports and data center power needs offers potential upside. Key risks include commodity price volatility and the structural limitations of futures-based ETFs versus equity-based alternatives like FCG.
WM trades at $217.78, down 0.55% on the day, with a bearish technical signal from moving averages. The company reported mixed Q2 2026 earnings, beating EPS estimates but missing Q4 2025. Revenue grew to $25.20B in 2025, with strong profitability margins. Analysts maintain a buy consensus with a $263.43 price target, though technical indicators show near-term pressure.
The outlook is supported by steady waste-service demand and sustainability investments, but high debt levels and valuation concerns pose risks. CEO transition adds uncertainty, while institutional buying signals confidence. Upside exists if execution aligns with analyst targets, but investors should weigh premium valuation against growth sustainability.
Returns comparison
Trailing returns across standard periods
Returns comparison
Trailing returns across standard periods
About United States Natural Gas Fund
UNG is a commodity ETF that tracks the daily price movements of natural gas futures. It primarily invests in front-month contracts at the Henry Hub, making it a highly volatile tool for short-term trading rather than long-term holding due to contango and roll costs.
Read more on UNG →About Waste Management, Inc.
Waste Management ranks as the largest integrated provider of traditional solid waste services in the United States, operating approximately 260 active landfills and about 340 transfer stations. The company serves residential, commercial, and industrial end markets and is also a leading recycler in North America.
Read more on WM →
