Under Armour Inc Class A vs ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd — how do they compare? Under Armour Inc Class A trades at $7.3 (market cap $3.07B), while ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd trades at $24.92 (market cap $2.93B). The key difference: Under Armour Inc Class A and ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd are close in size by market cap, and ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd pays a 20.16% dividend while Under Armour Inc Class A pays none. Which is the better fit depends on your goals.
| UAA | ZIM | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | $3.07B | $2.93B |
Sector | Consumer Cyclical | Industrials |
52-Week High | $8.14 | $29.27 |
52-Week Low | $4.17 | $12.44 |
Enterprise Value | $4.70B | $6.78B |
Dividend Yield | — | 20.16% |
Trailing returns across standard periods
Latest headlines on both assets
Under Armour develops, markets, and distributes athletic apparel, footwear, and accessories in North America and other territories. Consumers of its apparel include professional and amateur athletes, sponsored college and professional teams, and people with active lifestyles. The company sells merchandise through direct-to-consumer, including e-commerce and more than 400 combined factory house and brand house stores, and wholesale channels. Under Armour also operates a digital fitness app called MapMyFitness. The Baltimore-based company was founded in 1996.
Read more on UAA →ZIM is a global container liner shipping company that employs a 'global-niche' strategy, focusing on specific trade lanes where it holds a competitive advantage. Unlike larger, asset-heavy competitors, ZIM operates an agile, charter-intensive fleet, allowing it to rapidly adjust capacity to market demand while prioritizing digitalization and specialized cargo like refrigerated (reefer) goods.
Read more on ZIM →