Compare Under Armour Inc Class A (UAA) vs Viatris Inc (VTRS) Price & Performance
Price performance (Past 24H)
Key statistics
Key statistics
Under Armour Inc Class A vs Viatris Inc — how do they compare? Under Armour Inc Class A trades at $5.26 (market cap $2.26B), while Viatris Inc trades at $16.25 (market cap $18.69B). The key difference: Viatris Inc is far larger — about 8.3× Under Armour Inc Class A's market cap, and Viatris Inc pays a 2.95% dividend while Under Armour Inc Class A pays none. Which is the better fit depends on your goals.
| UAA | VTRS | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | $2.26B | $18.69B |
Sector | Consumer Cyclical | Health |
52-Week High | $8.14 | $17.86 |
52-Week Low | $4.17 | $9.49 |
Enterprise Value | $3.24B | $30.80B |
Dividend Yield | — | 2.95% |
Aura AI Summary
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
Aura AI Summary
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
Under Armour (UAA) is trading at $5.265, down 10.15% with bearish technical signals despite recent earnings beats. The company faces significant fundamental challenges with negative net income margins (-9.99%) and declining revenue trends from $5.7B in 2024 to $5.2B in 2025. Recent Q1 2027 earnings showed a profit beat but weaker revenue and cautious guidance, reflecting ongoing struggles in North American and Asia-Pacific markets. Cash flow remains negative at -$362M for 2025, though valuation ratios like P/S of 0.46 appear attractive relative to peers.
The outlook remains challenging with persistent revenue declines and profitability issues offset by potential value opportunities. Key risks include weak consumer spending, inventory management challenges, and competitive pressures. Analyst consensus is mixed with 27% buy ratings but a $6.67 price target suggesting 27% upside from current levels, though institutional sentiment appears cautious given the technical bearish signals and fundamental headwinds.
Viatris (VTRS) trades at $16.33, up 0.31% on the day, with a bearish technical signal despite recent earnings beats. The company reported Q2 2026 EPS of $0.69, exceeding expectations, and revenue growth of 5% year-over-year. However, negative net income margins and a high P/E ratio of 236.2 highlight profitability challenges. Recent developments include FDA approval for Gwyn Lo contraceptive patch and ongoing divestitures to sharpen focus.
Outlook remains mixed: operational improvements and dividend payments offer stability, but persistent net losses and high debt pose risks. Analyst consensus leans Hold (61.54%), reflecting cautious optimism amid execution uncertainties. Investment appeal hinges on successful margin recovery and debt management in a competitive generic drug market.
Returns comparison
Trailing returns across standard periods
Returns comparison
Trailing returns across standard periods
Top news
Latest headlines on both assets
Top news
Latest headlines on both assets
About Under Armour Inc Class A
Under Armour develops, markets, and distributes athletic apparel, footwear, and accessories in North America and other territories. Consumers of its apparel include professional and amateur athletes, sponsored college and professional teams, and people with active lifestyles. The company sells merchandise through direct-to-consumer, including e-commerce and more than 400 combined factory house and brand house stores, and wholesale channels. Under Armour also operates a digital fitness app called MapMyFitness. The Baltimore-based company was founded in 1996.
Read more on UAA →About Viatris Inc
Formed by the combination of Mylan and Pfizer's Upjohn business in 2020, Viatris is one of the world's largest generic drug manufacturers, with a substantial off-patent branded drug portfolio. Its portfolio consists of more than 1,400 molecules with penetration across most of the developed world and in select emerging markets. The company's branded drug portfolio consists of off-patent blockbuster drugs that continue to generate strong sales, including Lipitor, Norvasc, Lyrica, Viagra, and EpiPen. While global competition has facilitated the commodification of small-molecule generic drugs, the company has demonstrated an edge over peers in its ability to manufacture complex generics (for example, generic Advair and Copaxone).
Read more on VTRS →
