TotalEnergies SE vs VF Corp — how do they compare? TotalEnergies SE trades at $85.71 (market cap $187.35B), while VF Corp trades at $14.52 (market cap $5.65B). The key difference: TotalEnergies SE is far larger — about 33.2× VF Corp's market cap, and TotalEnergies SE pays the higher dividend (5.03%). Which is the better fit depends on your goals — on Pluang, investors hold TotalEnergies SE for 90 Days and VF Corp for 64 Days on average.
| TTE | VFC | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | $187.35B | $5.65B |
Volume | 1,924,317 | 6,542,273 |
Sector | Energy | Consumer Cyclical |
52-Week High | $93.60 | $21.55 |
52-Week Low | $57.39 | $12.62 |
Typical Hold Time | 90 Days | 64 Days |
Enterprise Value | $218.34B | $9.94B |
Dividend Yield | 5.03% | 2.5% |
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
TotalEnergies (TTE) trades at $86.02, up 2.43% with strong earnings beats in Q1 and Q2 2026. The stock shows attractive valuation metrics with P/E of 10.54 and P/S of 0.94, while maintaining solid profitability with 9.08% net margin. Recent news highlights $10 billion Argentina investment and strategic growth plans through 2030, though technical indicators signal bearish momentum with key support at $83-84 levels.
TTE presents value opportunity with discounted valuation and dividend growth strategy, but faces headwinds from declining revenue trends and bearish technical setup. The 17% upside to consensus price target of $95.33 and 55.88% analyst buy rating support bullish case, though investors should monitor oil price volatility and execution of new investments.
VFC trades at $14.53, up 0.55% with a bullish technical signal from moving averages. The company reported mixed quarterly results, beating in Q4 2025 but missing in subsequent quarters. Revenue declined from $11.8B in 2022 to $9.5B in 2025, with net losses in recent years. Analyst consensus shows 41% buy ratings with an $18.33 price target, while the stock faces execution risks from Vans brand weakness despite stronger Outdoor segment performance.
The outlook remains cautious with valuation appearing reasonable (P/E 20.84, P/S 0.6) but dependent on successful turnaround execution. Key risks include persistent Vans weakness, high debt levels, and competitive pressures. Upside potential exists if management can stabilize revenue and improve profitability, but investors face significant execution uncertainty in the apparel sector.
Trailing returns across standard periods
What Pluang investors did over the last 30 days
No sentiment data available yet.
TotalEnergies is an integrated oil and gas company that explores for, produces, and refines oil around the world. In 2021, it produced 1.5 million barrels of liquids and 7.2 billion cubic feet of natural gas per day. At year-end 2020, reserves stood at 12.1 billion barrels of oil equivalent, 45% of which are liquids. During 2021, it had LNG sales of 42 Mt. The company owns interests in refineries with capacity of nearly 1.8 million barrels a day, primarily in Europe, distributes refined products in 65 countries, and manufactures commodity and specialty chemicals. It also holds a 19% interest in Russian oil company Novatek. At year-end, its gross installed renewable power generation capacity was 10.3 GW.
Read more on TTE →VF designs, produces, and distributes branded apparel and accessories. Its largest apparel categories include action sports, outdoor, and workwear. Its portfolio of about a dozen brands includes Vans, The North Face, Timberland, Supreme, and Dickies. VF markets its products in the Americas, Europe, and Asia-Pacific through wholesale sales to retailers, e-commerce, and branded stores owned by the company and partners. The company has grown through multiple acquisitions and traces its roots to 1899.
Read more on VFC →