Compare TotalEnergies SE (TTE) vs United States Natural Gas Fund (UNG) Price & Performance
Price performance (Past 24H)
Key statistics
Key statistics
TotalEnergies SE vs United States Natural Gas Fund — how do they compare? TotalEnergies SE trades at $91.46 (market cap $200.03B), while United States Natural Gas Fund trades at $10.04. The key difference: TotalEnergies SE pays a 4.7% dividend while United States Natural Gas Fund pays none, and TotalEnergies SE is trading nearer its 52-week high, United States Natural Gas Fund nearer its low. Which is the better fit depends on your goals.
| TTE | UNG | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | $200.03B | — |
Sector | Energy | Commodities - Energy |
52-Week High | $93.60 | $16.90 |
52-Week Low | $57.39 | $9.63 |
Enterprise Value | $231.02B | — |
Dividend Yield | 4.7% | — |
Aura AI Summary
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
Aura AI Summary
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
TotalEnergies (TTE) trades at $90.1, up 1.7% on the day, with a bullish technical signal from moving averages and a consensus analyst price target of $98. Recent earnings show a beat in Q2 2026, and the company is advancing key LNG projects in Papua New Guinea and Angola. Cash flow improved to a positive $358 million in 2025, though revenue has declined from 2022 peaks.
The outlook is positive given analyst support and strategic investments, but risks include volatile oil prices and execution challenges. The stock offers value with a P/E of 11.28 and a 9.08% net margin, supported by a strong dividend history. Investors should weigh growth initiatives against energy market cyclicality.
UNG trades at $10.46, down 0.95% with a bearish technical signal from moving averages. The ETF faces headwinds from high natural gas production and storage levels, though weather-driven demand provides some support. Recent EIA forecasts project record natural gas supply and demand through 2027, creating a mixed fundamental backdrop for this futures-based commodity ETF.
The outlook remains challenged by oversupply concerns, though long-term demand growth from LNG exports and data center power needs offers potential upside. Key risks include commodity price volatility and the structural limitations of futures-based ETFs versus equity-based alternatives like FCG.
Returns comparison
Trailing returns across standard periods
Returns comparison
Trailing returns across standard periods
About TotalEnergies SE
TotalEnergies is an integrated oil and gas company that explores for, produces, and refines oil around the world. In 2021, it produced 1.5 million barrels of liquids and 7.2 billion cubic feet of natural gas per day. At year-end 2020, reserves stood at 12.1 billion barrels of oil equivalent, 45% of which are liquids. During 2021, it had LNG sales of 42 Mt. The company owns interests in refineries with capacity of nearly 1.8 million barrels a day, primarily in Europe, distributes refined products in 65 countries, and manufactures commodity and specialty chemicals. It also holds a 19% interest in Russian oil company Novatek. At year-end, its gross installed renewable power generation capacity was 10.3 GW.
Read more on TTE →About United States Natural Gas Fund
UNG is a commodity ETF that tracks the daily price movements of natural gas futures. It primarily invests in front-month contracts at the Henry Hub, making it a highly volatile tool for short-term trading rather than long-term holding due to contango and roll costs.
Read more on UNG →
