Compare Thomson Reuters Corp (TRI) vs Global X Uranium ETF (URA) Price & Performance
Price performance (Past 24H)
Key statistics
Key statistics
Thomson Reuters Corp vs Global X Uranium ETF — how do they compare? Thomson Reuters Corp trades at $97 (market cap $42.75B), while Global X Uranium ETF trades at $46.85. The key difference: Thomson Reuters Corp pays a 2.65% dividend while Global X Uranium ETF pays none, and Global X Uranium ETF is trading nearer its 52-week high, Thomson Reuters Corp nearer its low. Which is the better fit depends on your goals.
| TRI | URA | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | $42.75B | — |
Sector | Industrials | Commodities - Metals/Agriculture |
52-Week High | $173.48 | $61.81 |
52-Week Low | $76.55 | $37.52 |
Enterprise Value | $45.37B | — |
Dividend Yield | 2.65% | — |
Aura AI Summary
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
Aura AI Summary
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
Thomson Reuters (TRI) trades at $98.81, down 6.5% in 24 hours, with a bearish technical signal and support near $97. The company reported Q2 2026 EPS of $0.99, beating estimates, and raised full-year revenue guidance. Revenue grew 9% organically, with strong performance in Legal, Corporates, and Tax segments. Net income margin is 21.22%, and the P/E ratio is 26.03. Recent news highlights AI expansion with the launch of the proprietary Thomson-1 LLM and a cybersecurity incident affecting its case management system.
Outlook is mixed: robust recurring revenue and AI adoption support growth, but the stock faces near-term pressure from the price drop and cybersecurity risks. Analysts maintain a buy consensus with a $113 price target, implying 14% upside. Key risks include execution on AI initiatives, competitive pressures, and potential fallout from the security breach.
URA (Global X Uranium ETF) trades at $47.50, up 3.13% today, with strong bullish technical signals from moving averages. The ETF benefits from growing nuclear energy demand driven by AI power needs and government support, including recent $17.5 billion in U.S. reactor funding. However, key financial ratios remain unavailable, and the sector faces volatility from uranium price fluctuations and regulatory shifts.
Outlook remains positive due to structural tailwinds in nuclear energy, but investors should monitor uranium contract pricing and ETF expense ratios. Near-term resistance sits at $48-$50, with support at $45-$47. Risks include policy changes and miner concentration, though institutional interest in nuclear ETFs is rising.
Returns comparison
Trailing returns across standard periods
Returns comparison
Trailing returns across standard periods
About Thomson Reuters Corp
Thomson Reuters is the result of the $17.6 billion megamerger of Canada's Thomson and the United Kingdom's Reuters Group in 2008 and the 2018 carve-out of its finance and risk business, Refinitiv, in which it holds a 45% stake. In 2019, the company agreed to exchange its 45% stake in Refinitiv for a 15% stake in LSE, which closed in early 2021. Since the divestiture, the company is more concentrated on selling its flagship legal data and software, Westlaw, and its tax accounting software, Onesource. Reuters sees roughly 80% of revenue and 70% of expenses attributed to the United States, while the remainder (largely through the global print and Reuters News segments) is distributed across Latin America, Europe, the Middle East, Africa, and Asia-Pacific.
Read more on TRI →About Global X Uranium ETF
URA provides broad exposure to the global uranium industry and nuclear energy sector. Unlike pure-play mining funds, it includes companies involved in nuclear component production and infrastructure, with top 2026 holdings such as Cameco, Oklo, and Uranium Energy Corp.
Read more on URA →
