Compare Thomson Reuters Corp (TRI) vs United States Natural Gas Fund (UNG) Price & Performance
Price performance (Past 24H)
Key statistics
Key statistics
Thomson Reuters Corp vs United States Natural Gas Fund — how do they compare? Thomson Reuters Corp trades at $101.92 (market cap $43.89B), while United States Natural Gas Fund trades at $11.1 (market cap $517.27M). The key difference: Thomson Reuters Corp is far larger — about 84.8× United States Natural Gas Fund's market cap, and Thomson Reuters Corp pays a 2.58% dividend while United States Natural Gas Fund pays none. Which is the better fit depends on your goals — on Pluang, investors hold Thomson Reuters Corp for 63 Days and United States Natural Gas Fund for 22 Days on average.
| TRI | UNG | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | $43.89B | $517.27M |
Volume | 1,648,199 | 29,485,537 |
Sector | Industrials | Commodities - Energy |
52-Week High | $163.45 | $16.90 |
52-Week Low | $76.55 | $9.63 |
Typical Hold Time | 63 Days | 22 Days |
Enterprise Value | $46.51B | — |
Dividend Yield | 2.58% | — |
Aura AI Summary
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
Aura AI Summary
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
Thomson Reuters (TRI) trades at $101.52, up 2.26% today, with bullish technical signals and strong analyst support. The company shows solid fundamentals with 10% organic growth in core businesses and a 21.22% net income margin. Recent strategic moves include divesting its printing unit and launching a proprietary AI model, positioning TRI for tech-focused growth. Cash flow trends show operational strength despite recent negative net cash flow due to strategic investments.
TRI presents a compelling investment case with analyst consensus target of $133.25 (31% upside), supported by recurring revenue growth and AI expansion. Risks include cybersecurity incidents and execution challenges in tech transformation. The stock's current valuation at 26.75 P/E appears reasonable given growth prospects, making it attractive for long-term investors seeking exposure to content and technology services.
UNG trades at $11.06, up 0.28% with a bullish technical signal from moving averages. The fund reported $65.15M net income for 2024 despite zero revenue, with strong total assets of $790.02M and minimal debt. Recent news highlights natural gas market volatility with record production and geopolitical tensions influencing energy prices.
The outlook is mixed: technical strength and clean balance sheet support stability, but zero revenue and negative cash flow (-$251.70M) pose fundamental risks. Investors face exposure to natural gas price swings and supply-demand imbalances, requiring careful monitoring of energy market developments.
Returns comparison
Trailing returns across standard periods
Returns comparison
Trailing returns across standard periods
Investor sentiment on Pluang
What Pluang investors did over the last 30 days
Investor sentiment on Pluang
What Pluang investors did over the last 30 days
No sentiment data available yet.
About Thomson Reuters Corp
Thomson Reuters is the result of the $17.6 billion megamerger of Canada's Thomson and the United Kingdom's Reuters Group in 2008 and the 2018 carve-out of its finance and risk business, Refinitiv, in which it holds a 45% stake. In 2019, the company agreed to exchange its 45% stake in Refinitiv for a 15% stake in LSE, which closed in early 2021. Since the divestiture, the company is more concentrated on selling its flagship legal data and software, Westlaw, and its tax accounting software, Onesource. Reuters sees roughly 80% of revenue and 70% of expenses attributed to the United States, while the remainder (largely through the global print and Reuters News segments) is distributed across Latin America, Europe, the Middle East, Africa, and Asia-Pacific.
Read more on TRI →About United States Natural Gas Fund
UNG is a commodity ETF that tracks the daily price movements of natural gas futures. It primarily invests in front-month contracts at the Henry Hub, making it a highly volatile tool for short-term trading rather than long-term holding due to contango and roll costs.
Read more on UNG →
