Compare Thomson Reuters Corp (TRI) vs United States Natural Gas Fund (UNG) Price & Performance
Price performance (Past 24H)
Key statistics
Key statistics
Thomson Reuters Corp vs United States Natural Gas Fund — how do they compare? Thomson Reuters Corp trades at $95.72 (market cap $41.28B), while United States Natural Gas Fund trades at $10.42. The key difference: Thomson Reuters Corp pays a 2.75% dividend while United States Natural Gas Fund pays none, and Thomson Reuters Corp is trading nearer its 52-week high, United States Natural Gas Fund nearer its low. Which is the better fit depends on your goals.
| TRI | UNG | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | $41.28B | — |
Sector | Industrials | Commodities - Energy |
52-Week High | $205.54 | $16.90 |
52-Week Low | $76.55 | $10.15 |
Enterprise Value | $43.24B | — |
Dividend Yield | 2.75% | — |
Aura AI Summary
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
Aura AI Summary
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
Thomson Reuters (TRI) trades at $95.43, down 0.8% today, with a bullish technical signal and strong analyst consensus. The stock shows robust profitability with a 19.93% net margin and has beaten earnings estimates in two of the last three quarters. Recent corporate actions include a special dividend and a reverse stock split, while news highlights AI integration and a joint venture with KKR.
Outlook is positive with a consensus price target of $129.96 implying 36% upside, supported by solid cash flow and debt reduction. Risks include execution of AI strategy and competitive pressures. Wall Street sentiment is bullish with 52% buy ratings, but investors should monitor Q2 2026 earnings due August 5 for confirmation of growth trends.
UNG trades at $10.29, down 2.09% in the last session, with technical indicators signaling a bearish trend. The stock shows oversold conditions on short-term RSI readings but faces strong selling pressure from moving averages. Recent news highlights volatility in natural gas futures, with prices influenced by weather forecasts and LNG demand fluctuations. Fundamental data is unavailable, limiting traditional valuation analysis.
The outlook remains cautious due to commodity price dependency and lack of fundamental metrics. Risks include energy market volatility and competition from equity-based natural gas ETFs. Analyst sentiment is mixed, with technicals leaning bearish but potential for short-term rebounds if gas prices stabilize.
Returns comparison
Trailing returns across standard periods
Returns comparison
Trailing returns across standard periods
Top news
Latest headlines on both assets
Top news
Latest headlines on both assets
About Thomson Reuters Corp
Thomson Reuters is the result of the $17.6 billion megamerger of Canada's Thomson and the United Kingdom's Reuters Group in 2008 and the 2018 carve-out of its finance and risk business, Refinitiv, in which it holds a 45% stake. In 2019, the company agreed to exchange its 45% stake in Refinitiv for a 15% stake in LSE, which closed in early 2021. Since the divestiture, the company is more concentrated on selling its flagship legal data and software, Westlaw, and its tax accounting software, Onesource. Reuters sees roughly 80% of revenue and 70% of expenses attributed to the United States, while the remainder (largely through the global print and Reuters News segments) is distributed across Latin America, Europe, the Middle East, Africa, and Asia-Pacific.
Read more on TRI →About United States Natural Gas Fund
UNG is a commodity ETF that tracks the daily price movements of natural gas futures. It primarily invests in front-month contracts at the Henry Hub, making it a highly volatile tool for short-term trading rather than long-term holding due to contango and roll costs.
Read more on UNG →
