Compare Tapestry, Inc. (TPR) vs Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLP) Price & Performance
Price performance (Past 24H)
Key statistics
Key statistics
Tapestry, Inc. vs Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR Fund — how do they compare? Tapestry, Inc. trades at $140.62 (market cap $28.51B), while Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR Fund trades at $84.09. The key difference: Tapestry, Inc. pays a 1.13% dividend while Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR Fund pays none, and Tapestry, Inc. is trading nearer its 52-week high, Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR Fund nearer its low. Which is the better fit depends on your goals.
| TPR | XLP | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | $28.51B | — |
Sector | Consumer Cyclical | — |
52-Week High | $160.49 | $90.00 |
52-Week Low | $95.69 | $75.61 |
Enterprise Value | $31.37B | — |
Dividend Yield | 1.13% | — |
Returns comparison
Trailing returns across standard periods
Returns comparison
Trailing returns across standard periods
About Tapestry, Inc.
Coach, Kate Spade, and Stuart Weitzman are the fashion and accessory brands that comprise Tapestry. The firm's products are sold through about 1,400 company-operated stores, wholesale channels, and e-commerce in North America (67% of fiscal 2022 sales), Europe, Asia (28% of fiscal 2022 sales), and elsewhere. Coach (74% of fiscal 2022 sales) is best known for affordable luxury leather products. Kate Spade (22% of fiscal 2022 sales) is known for colorful patterns and graphics. Women's handbags and accessories produced 69% of Tapestry's sales in fiscal 2022. Stuart Weitzman, Tapestry's smallest brand, generates nearly all its revenue from women's footwear.
Read more on TPR →About Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR Fund
In seeking to track the performance of the index, the fund employs a replication strategy. It generally invests substantially all, but at least 95%, of its total assets in the securities comprising the index. The index includes companies that have been identified as Consumer Staples companies by the GICS®. It is non-diversified.
Read more on XLP →
