Tapestry, Inc. vs United States Natural Gas Fund — how do they compare? Tapestry, Inc. trades at $113.97 (market cap $23.44B), while United States Natural Gas Fund trades at $10.04. The key difference: Tapestry, Inc. pays a 1.57% dividend while United States Natural Gas Fund pays none, and Tapestry, Inc. is trading nearer its 52-week high, United States Natural Gas Fund nearer its low. Which is the better fit depends on your goals.
| TPR | UNG | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | $23.44B | — |
Sector | Consumer Cyclical | Commodities - Energy |
52-Week High | $164.78 | $16.90 |
52-Week Low | $98.81 | $9.63 |
Enterprise Value | $26.25B | — |
Dividend Yield | 1.57% | — |
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
TPR (Tapestry Inc.) is trading at $117.58, down 3.73% in the last session, with a bearish technical signal despite bullish oscillators. The company shows strong profitability with 77.82% gross margins and 19.09% net income margin, though 2025 net income declined significantly. Recent earnings have consistently beaten estimates, and analyst consensus remains strongly bullish with a $182.44 price target representing 55% upside potential.
The outlook remains positive with international growth accelerating in China and Europe, supported by a direct-to-consumer model. Key risks include Kate Spade execution challenges, tariff pressures, and premium valuation. Institutional buying activity remains strong, with BlackRock acquiring a $2.6 billion position in Q2 2026, supporting the bullish analyst sentiment.
UNG trades at $10.46, down 0.95% with a bearish technical signal from moving averages. The ETF faces headwinds from high natural gas production and storage levels, though weather-driven demand provides some support. Recent EIA forecasts project record natural gas supply and demand through 2027, creating a mixed fundamental backdrop for this futures-based commodity ETF.
The outlook remains challenged by oversupply concerns, though long-term demand growth from LNG exports and data center power needs offers potential upside. Key risks include commodity price volatility and the structural limitations of futures-based ETFs versus equity-based alternatives like FCG.
Trailing returns across standard periods
Latest headlines on both assets
Coach, Kate Spade, and Stuart Weitzman are the fashion and accessory brands that comprise Tapestry. The firm's products are sold through about 1,400 company-operated stores, wholesale channels, and e-commerce in North America (67% of fiscal 2022 sales), Europe, Asia (28% of fiscal 2022 sales), and elsewhere. Coach (74% of fiscal 2022 sales) is best known for affordable luxury leather products. Kate Spade (22% of fiscal 2022 sales) is known for colorful patterns and graphics. Women's handbags and accessories produced 69% of Tapestry's sales in fiscal 2022. Stuart Weitzman, Tapestry's smallest brand, generates nearly all its revenue from women's footwear.
Read more on TPR →UNG is a commodity ETF that tracks the daily price movements of natural gas futures. It primarily invests in front-month contracts at the Henry Hub, making it a highly volatile tool for short-term trading rather than long-term holding due to contango and roll costs.
Read more on UNG →