Tidewater Inc vs Williams Companies Inc — how do they compare? Tidewater Inc trades at $85.23 (market cap $4.21B), while Williams Companies Inc trades at $72.69 (market cap $88.48B). The key difference: Williams Companies Inc is far larger — about 21× Tidewater Inc's market cap, and Williams Companies Inc pays a 2.9% dividend while Tidewater Inc pays none. Which is the better fit depends on your goals — on Pluang, investors hold Tidewater Inc for 26 Days and Williams Companies Inc for 58 Days on average.
| TDW | WMB | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | $4.21B | $88.48B |
Volume | 590,005 | 9,280,680 |
Sector | Energy | Energy |
52-Week High | $100.61 | $79.40 |
52-Week Low | $47.29 | $56.51 |
Typical Hold Time | 26 Days | 58 Days |
Enterprise Value | $4.25B | $119.11B |
Dividend Yield | — | 2.9% |
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
Tidewater (TDW) trades at $85.16, up 2.11% today, with a bullish technical signal supported by moving averages. The stock shows strong profitability with an 18.34% net margin and 19.49% ROE, though recent earnings missed expectations in Q1 and Q2 2026. The company completed the Wilson Sons Ultratug acquisition in August 2026, enhancing its offshore services footprint. Cash flow remains robust with $252.54M net cash flow in 2025.
Outlook is mixed: analyst consensus targets $105.50 (23.9% upside), but earnings volatility and competitive pressures pose risks. Institutional interest is strong, with BlackRock investing $503.20M in Q2 2026. Investors should weigh solid fundamentals against execution risks in a volatile energy market.
Williams Companies (WMB) trades at $72.68, up 1.71% with strong technical momentum and bullish analyst sentiment. The stock shows robust fundamentals with $11.95B revenue, 25.18% net margin, and consistent dividend growth. Recent earnings beat expectations in Q1 2026, while Q2 narrowly missed. Technical indicators signal bullish momentum with support at $71-$72 and resistance at $73-$74. The company benefits from stable fee-based revenues and strategic positioning in natural gas infrastructure.
WMB presents a compelling investment case with strong cash flow generation, 79% analyst buy ratings, and $87.27 price target upside. Key risks include energy market volatility and high debt levels. The AI-driven data center growth provides tailwinds for natural gas demand, supporting long-term revenue stability. Investors should weigh the attractive dividend yield against exposure to commodity price fluctuations and capital expenditure requirements.
Trailing returns across standard periods
What Pluang investors did over the last 30 days
Tidewater is the leading global provider of offshore support vessels (OSVs) to the energy industry. With the world's largest fleet of platform supply vessels (PSVs) and anchor handling tugs (AHTS), it provides critical logistics and marine support for offshore oil, gas, and renewable energy projects. Following a period of massive strategic consolidation, Tidewater is now focused on maximizing day rates and free cash flow in a supply-constrained market, positioning itself as a primary beneficiary of the multi-year offshore upcycle.
Read more on TDW →Williams is a midstream energy company that owns and operates the large Transco and Northwest pipeline systems and associated natural gas gathering, processing, and storage assets. In August 2018, the firm acquired the remaining 26% ownership of its limited partner, Williams Partners.
Read more on WMB →