Trip.com Group Ltd vs Waste Management, Inc. — how do they compare? Trip.com Group Ltd trades at $39.2 (market cap $26.04B), while Waste Management, Inc. trades at $217.1 (market cap $87.05B). The key difference: Waste Management, Inc. is far larger — about 3.3× Trip.com Group Ltd's market cap, and Waste Management, Inc. pays the higher dividend (1.74%). Which is the better fit depends on your goals.
| TCOM | WM | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | $26.04B | $87.05B |
Sector | Consumer Cyclical | Industrials |
52-Week High | $78.96 | $246.51 |
52-Week Low | $39.19 | $196.77 |
Enterprise Value | $18.64B | $109.85B |
Dividend Yield | 0.42% | 1.74% |
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
Trip.com (TCOM) trades at $40.50, down 1.29% with bearish technical signals despite strong fundamentals. The company reported robust 2025 results with $62.41B revenue and 53.34% net margin, though recent quarters show earnings misses. Valuation metrics appear attractive with P/E of 6.01 and EV/EBITDA of 3.21. However, the stock faces headwinds from a recent $770M Chinese antitrust penalty and declining cash flow trends.
The investment case balances deep value against regulatory risks. Analyst consensus remains bullish with $59.29 price target (47% upside), but technical weakness and China regulatory overhang create near-term uncertainty. Long-term growth prospects in travel recovery support the bull case, though investors should monitor Q2 2026 earnings due September 15 for confirmation of business momentum.
WM trades at $217.78, down 0.55% on the day, with a bearish technical signal from moving averages. The company reported mixed Q2 2026 earnings, beating EPS estimates but missing Q4 2025. Revenue grew to $25.20B in 2025, with strong profitability margins. Analysts maintain a buy consensus with a $263.43 price target, though technical indicators show near-term pressure.
The outlook is supported by steady waste-service demand and sustainability investments, but high debt levels and valuation concerns pose risks. CEO transition adds uncertainty, while institutional buying signals confidence. Upside exists if execution aligns with analyst targets, but investors should weigh premium valuation against growth sustainability.
Trailing returns across standard periods
Trip.com is the largest online travel agent in China and is positioned to benefit from the country's rising demand for higher-margin outbound travel as passport penetration is only 12% in China. The company generated about 78% of sales from accommodation reservations and transportation ticketing in 2020. The rest of revenue comes from package tours and corporate travel. Prior to the pandemic in 2019, the company generated 25% of revenue from international business, which is important to its margin expansion. Most of sales come from websites and mobile platforms, while the rest come from call centers. The competes in a crowded OTA industry in China, including Meituan, Alibaba-backed Fliggy, Toncheng, and Qunar. The company was founded in 1999 and listed on the Nasdaq in December 2003.
Read more on TCOM →Waste Management ranks as the largest integrated provider of traditional solid waste services in the United States, operating approximately 260 active landfills and about 340 transfer stations. The company serves residential, commercial, and industrial end markets and is also a leading recycler in North America.
Read more on WM →