Seagate Technology Holdings PLC vs VF Corp — how do they compare? Seagate Technology Holdings PLC trades at $787.3 (market cap $183.64B), while VF Corp trades at $14.52 (market cap $5.65B). The key difference: Seagate Technology Holdings PLC is far larger — about 32.5× VF Corp's market cap, and VF Corp pays the higher dividend (2.5%). Which is the better fit depends on your goals — on Pluang, investors hold Seagate Technology Holdings PLC for 41 Days and VF Corp for 64 Days on average.
| STX | VFC | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | $183.64B | $5.65B |
Volume | 4,409,190 | 6,542,273 |
Sector | Technology | Consumer Cyclical |
52-Week High | $1.09K | $21.55 |
52-Week Low | $211.63 | $12.62 |
Typical Hold Time | 41 Days | 64 Days |
Enterprise Value | $185.79B | $9.94B |
Dividend Yield | 0.37% | 2.5% |
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
STX trades at $774.83, down 3.82% amid concerns about increased competition from Toshiba's planned HDD production expansion. The stock shows strong fundamentals with Q2 2026 EPS beating expectations at $5.71 vs. $5.10, and robust profitability metrics including 26.11% net margin and 371.53% ROE. Technical indicators signal bearish momentum with price near support at $773, while analyst consensus remains positive with 53.85% buy ratings and $1,130 price target.
Despite near-term competitive pressures, STX maintains strong earnings momentum and leadership in AI storage markets. The primary risk involves Toshiba's capacity expansion potentially eroding pricing power, but projected 2026 revenue growth to $12.2B and net income of $3.2B support long-term upside. Current valuation at 58.1 P/E reflects growth expectations amid technical weakness.
VFC trades at $14.53, up 0.55% with a bullish technical signal from moving averages. The company reported mixed quarterly results, beating in Q4 2025 but missing in subsequent quarters. Revenue declined from $11.8B in 2022 to $9.5B in 2025, with net losses in recent years. Analyst consensus shows 41% buy ratings with an $18.33 price target, while the stock faces execution risks from Vans brand weakness despite stronger Outdoor segment performance.
The outlook remains cautious with valuation appearing reasonable (P/E 20.84, P/S 0.6) but dependent on successful turnaround execution. Key risks include persistent Vans weakness, high debt levels, and competitive pressures. Upside potential exists if management can stabilize revenue and improve profitability, but investors face significant execution uncertainty in the apparel sector.
Trailing returns across standard periods
What Pluang investors did over the last 30 days
No sentiment data available yet.
Latest headlines on both assets
Seagate is a leading supplier of hard disk drives for data storage to the enterprise and consumer markets. It forms a practical duopoly in the market with its chief rival, Western Digital
Read more on STX →VF designs, produces, and distributes branded apparel and accessories. Its largest apparel categories include action sports, outdoor, and workwear. Its portfolio of about a dozen brands includes Vans, The North Face, Timberland, Supreme, and Dickies. VF markets its products in the Americas, Europe, and Asia-Pacific through wholesale sales to retailers, e-commerce, and branded stores owned by the company and partners. The company has grown through multiple acquisitions and traces its roots to 1899.
Read more on VFC →