Schlumberger NV vs Waste Management, Inc. — how do they compare? Schlumberger NV trades at $57.07 (market cap $84.74B), while Waste Management, Inc. trades at $217.2 (market cap $87.05B). The key difference: Schlumberger NV and Waste Management, Inc. are close in size by market cap, and Schlumberger NV pays the higher dividend (2.07%). Which is the better fit depends on your goals.
| SLB | WM | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | $84.74B | $87.05B |
Sector | Energy | Industrials |
52-Week High | $60.10 | $246.51 |
52-Week Low | $31.72 | $196.77 |
Enterprise Value | $93.47B | $109.85B |
Dividend Yield | 2.07% | 1.74% |
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
SLB trades at $57.10, down 0.71% on the day, but remains near recent highs with a bullish technical trend. The company reported three consecutive quarterly earnings beats, with Q3 2026 expected at $0.62 EPS. Recent news highlights the $3.4 billion acquisition of Kelvion, expanding SLB's data center cooling business. Revenue for 2025 was $35.71 billion with a net income margin of 8.53%, though margins have softened from prior years. Analyst consensus is strongly bullish with an average price target of $63.00.
The outlook for SLB is positive, driven by strategic diversification into data centers and solid operational cash flow near $6.5 billion annually. Key risks include exposure to oil price volatility and integration challenges from the Kelvion deal. With 85% of analysts rating it a buy, the stock offers upside potential but requires monitoring of execution on new growth initiatives.
WM trades at $217.78, down 0.55% on the day, with a bearish technical signal from moving averages. The company reported mixed Q2 2026 earnings, beating EPS estimates but missing Q4 2025. Revenue grew to $25.20B in 2025, with strong profitability margins. Analysts maintain a buy consensus with a $263.43 price target, though technical indicators show near-term pressure.
The outlook is supported by steady waste-service demand and sustainability investments, but high debt levels and valuation concerns pose risks. CEO transition adds uncertainty, while institutional buying signals confidence. Upside exists if execution aligns with analyst targets, but investors should weigh premium valuation against growth sustainability.
Trailing returns across standard periods
Schlumberger is the largest oilfield service firm in the world, with expertise in myriad disciplines, including reservoir performance, well construction, production enhancement, and more recently, digital solutions. It maintains a reputation as one of the industry's leading innovators, which has earned it dominant share in numerous end markets.
Read more on SLB →Waste Management ranks as the largest integrated provider of traditional solid waste services in the United States, operating approximately 260 active landfills and about 340 transfer stations. The company serves residential, commercial, and industrial end markets and is also a leading recycler in North America.
Read more on WM →