Compare Schlumberger NV (SLB) vs United States Natural Gas Fund (UNG) Price & Performance
Price performance (Past 24H)
Key statistics
Key statistics
Schlumberger NV vs United States Natural Gas Fund — how do they compare? Schlumberger NV trades at $57.14 (market cap $84.74B), while United States Natural Gas Fund trades at $10.04. The key difference: Schlumberger NV pays a 2.07% dividend while United States Natural Gas Fund pays none, and Schlumberger NV is trading nearer its 52-week high, United States Natural Gas Fund nearer its low. Which is the better fit depends on your goals.
| SLB | UNG | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | $84.74B | — |
Sector | Energy | Commodities - Energy |
52-Week High | $60.10 | $16.90 |
52-Week Low | $31.72 | $9.63 |
Enterprise Value | $93.47B | — |
Dividend Yield | 2.07% | — |
Aura AI Summary
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
Aura AI Summary
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
SLB trades at $57.10, down 0.71% on the day, but remains near recent highs with a bullish technical trend. The company reported three consecutive quarterly earnings beats, with Q3 2026 expected at $0.62 EPS. Recent news highlights the $3.4 billion acquisition of Kelvion, expanding SLB's data center cooling business. Revenue for 2025 was $35.71 billion with a net income margin of 8.53%, though margins have softened from prior years. Analyst consensus is strongly bullish with an average price target of $63.00.
The outlook for SLB is positive, driven by strategic diversification into data centers and solid operational cash flow near $6.5 billion annually. Key risks include exposure to oil price volatility and integration challenges from the Kelvion deal. With 85% of analysts rating it a buy, the stock offers upside potential but requires monitoring of execution on new growth initiatives.
UNG trades at $10.46, down 0.95% with a bearish technical signal from moving averages. The ETF faces headwinds from high natural gas production and storage levels, though weather-driven demand provides some support. Recent EIA forecasts project record natural gas supply and demand through 2027, creating a mixed fundamental backdrop for this futures-based commodity ETF.
The outlook remains challenged by oversupply concerns, though long-term demand growth from LNG exports and data center power needs offers potential upside. Key risks include commodity price volatility and the structural limitations of futures-based ETFs versus equity-based alternatives like FCG.
Returns comparison
Trailing returns across standard periods
Returns comparison
Trailing returns across standard periods
About Schlumberger NV
Schlumberger is the largest oilfield service firm in the world, with expertise in myriad disciplines, including reservoir performance, well construction, production enhancement, and more recently, digital solutions. It maintains a reputation as one of the industry's leading innovators, which has earned it dominant share in numerous end markets.
Read more on SLB →About United States Natural Gas Fund
UNG is a commodity ETF that tracks the daily price movements of natural gas futures. It primarily invests in front-month contracts at the Henry Hub, making it a highly volatile tool for short-term trading rather than long-term holding due to contango and roll costs.
Read more on UNG →
