Compare Schlumberger NV (SLB) vs ProShares UltraPro QQQ ETF (TQQQ) Price & Performance
Price performance (Past 24H)
Key statistics
Key statistics
Schlumberger NV vs ProShares UltraPro QQQ ETF — how do they compare? Schlumberger NV trades at $48.66 (market cap $72.69B), while ProShares UltraPro QQQ ETF trades at $81.06 (market cap $38.74B). The key difference: Schlumberger NV is the larger of the two by market cap, and Schlumberger NV pays a 2.41% dividend while ProShares UltraPro QQQ ETF pays none. Which is the better fit depends on your goals — on Pluang, investors hold Schlumberger NV for 99 Days and ProShares UltraPro QQQ ETF for 24 Days on average.
| SLB | TQQQ | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | $72.69B | $38.74B |
Volume | 16,228,451 | 65,384,797 |
Sector | Energy | Leveraged / Inverse |
52-Week High | $60.10 | $87.22 |
52-Week Low | $31.72 | $37.89 |
Typical Hold Time | 99 Days | 24 Days |
Enterprise Value | $81.42B | — |
Dividend Yield | 2.41% | — |
Aura AI Summary
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
Aura AI Summary
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
SLB trades at $48.91, up 1.98% today, with a bearish technical signal despite recent earnings beats. The company maintains strong profitability with 8.53% net margin and 13.37% ROE, supported by recent contract wins in Saudi Arabia and Mozambique. Revenue declined slightly to $35.71B in 2025, but operating cash flow remains robust at $6.49B. Analyst consensus is strongly bullish with 85% buy ratings and $64.58 price target, representing 32% upside potential.
SLB presents a compelling value opportunity with strong fundamentals and positive analyst sentiment, though technical indicators suggest near-term weakness. The stock's current valuation at 23.89 P/E appears reasonable given the company's contract momentum and global energy technology leadership. Key risks include energy price volatility and execution challenges in new projects, but the dividend yield and institutional support provide downside protection.
TQQQ trades at $80.67, down 3.5% in the last session amid mixed technical signals. The ETF maintains a bullish overall technical rating with strong moving average support but faces neutral oscillators. Recent news highlights significant hidden costs beyond the stated 0.82% expense ratio, including financing charges that impact returns. Institutional activity shows mixed positioning with some firms reducing stakes while others add exposure.
Outlook remains volatile given TQQQ's 3x leveraged structure, which amplifies both gains and losses. The ETF faces headwinds from volatility decay and hidden costs, though AI-driven tech growth provides underlying support. Key risks include amplified drawdowns during market corrections and structural costs that erode long-term performance versus the underlying index.
Returns comparison
Trailing returns across standard periods
Returns comparison
Trailing returns across standard periods
Investor sentiment on Pluang
What Pluang investors did over the last 30 days
Investor sentiment on Pluang
What Pluang investors did over the last 30 days
About Schlumberger NV
Schlumberger is the largest oilfield service firm in the world, with expertise in myriad disciplines, including reservoir performance, well construction, production enhancement, and more recently, digital solutions. It maintains a reputation as one of the industry's leading innovators, which has earned it dominant share in numerous end markets.
Read more on SLB →About ProShares UltraPro QQQ ETF
TQQQ is a leveraged ETF that seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, that correspond to three times (3x) the daily performance of the Nasdaq-100 Index. It is one of the most liquid and actively traded instruments in the market, designed for sophisticated traders to amplify short-term bullish exposure to large-cap non-financial growth stocks, predominantly in the technology and communication sectors.
Read more on TQQQ →
