Schlumberger NV vs ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ ETF — how do they compare? Schlumberger NV trades at $48.87 (market cap $72.69B), while ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ ETF trades at $32.94 (market cap $2.23B). The key difference: Schlumberger NV is far larger — about 32.6× ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ ETF's market cap, and Schlumberger NV pays a 2.41% dividend while ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ ETF pays none. Which is the better fit depends on your goals — on Pluang, investors hold Schlumberger NV for 99 Days and ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ ETF for 12 Days on average.
| SLB | SQQQ | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | $72.69B | $2.23B |
Volume | 16,228,451 | 60,436,012 |
Sector | Energy | Leveraged / Inverse |
52-Week High | $60.10 | $89.43 |
52-Week Low | $31.72 | $31.83 |
Typical Hold Time | 99 Days | 12 Days |
Enterprise Value | $81.42B | — |
Dividend Yield | 2.41% | — |
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
SLB trades at $48.91, up 1.98% today, with a bearish technical signal despite recent earnings beats. The company maintains strong profitability with 8.53% net margin and 13.37% ROE, supported by recent contract wins in Saudi Arabia and Mozambique. Revenue declined slightly to $35.71B in 2025, but operating cash flow remains robust at $6.49B. Analyst consensus is strongly bullish with 85% buy ratings and $64.58 price target, representing 32% upside potential.
SLB presents a compelling value opportunity with strong fundamentals and positive analyst sentiment, though technical indicators suggest near-term weakness. The stock's current valuation at 23.89 P/E appears reasonable given the company's contract momentum and global energy technology leadership. Key risks include energy price volatility and execution challenges in new projects, but the dividend yield and institutional support provide downside protection.
SQQQ, the ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ ETF, is currently trading at $33.02, up 2.93% on the day. The technical picture remains bearish with moving averages signaling continued downward pressure, though oscillators show neutral momentum. As a 3x leveraged inverse ETF designed to profit from Nasdaq 100 declines, SQQQ's performance is directly tied to technology sector weakness. Recent news highlights its potential role as a hedging tool against QQQ holdings during market downturns.
The outlook for SQQQ depends heavily on technology sector performance, with potential gains during Nasdaq 100 declines but significant decay risk during sustained rallies. Investors face substantial volatility risks due to daily rebalancing and compounding effects. Current market conditions suggest continued uncertainty for tech stocks, potentially supporting SQQQ's short-term appeal as a tactical hedge.
Trailing returns across standard periods
What Pluang investors did over the last 30 days
Schlumberger is the largest oilfield service firm in the world, with expertise in myriad disciplines, including reservoir performance, well construction, production enhancement, and more recently, digital solutions. It maintains a reputation as one of the industry's leading innovators, which has earned it dominant share in numerous end markets.
Read more on SLB →SQQQ is a leveraged inverse ETF that seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, that correspond to three times the inverse (-3x) of the daily performance of the Nasdaq-100 Index. It is a tactical trading tool designed for sophisticated investors to profit from or hedge against declines in large-cap technology and growth stocks. Due to its daily reset and the effects of compounding, it is intended for short-term use and carries significant risk if held during periods of high market volatility.
Read more on SQQQ →