Schlumberger NV vs ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ ETF — how do they compare? Schlumberger NV trades at $52.93 (market cap $79.67B), while ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ ETF trades at $37.11. The key difference: Schlumberger NV pays a 2.2% dividend while ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ ETF pays none, and Schlumberger NV is trading nearer its 52-week high, ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ ETF nearer its low. Which is the better fit depends on your goals.
| SLB | SQQQ | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | $79.67B | — |
Sector | Energy | Leveraged / Inverse |
52-Week High | $58.01 | $92.95 |
52-Week Low | $31.72 | $36.31 |
Enterprise Value | $88.40B | — |
Dividend Yield | 2.2% | — |
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
SLB trades at $52.96, down 0.45% on the day, with a bullish technical signal from moving averages and oscillators. The company reported strong Q2 2026 earnings, beating estimates with EPS of $0.55, and maintains a consensus analyst price target of $63.00. Revenue for 2025 was $35.71 billion, with a net income margin of 8.53%, though margins have softened from prior years. Recent news highlights growth in digital and offshore segments, offset by Middle East challenges.
The outlook for SLB is positive, driven by earnings beats and robust analyst support, but risks include regional volatility and margin pressure. Upside potential exists if digital and production gains accelerate, yet investors must weigh debt levels and geopolitical headwinds against the stock's current valuation near 52-week highs.
SQQQ trades at $37.05, down 1.83% on the day, reflecting its inverse leveraged structure designed to move opposite the Nasdaq-100. The technical picture remains bearish with moving averages signaling continued downward pressure, though oversold conditions suggest potential for short-term bounces. Recent news highlights SQQQ's role as a tactical hedging tool rather than a long-term investment, with significant erosion risk due to daily reset mechanisms.
SQQQ serves as a high-risk tactical instrument for bearish Nasdaq-100 bets, with success dependent on precise market timing. The ETF faces structural decay from daily rebalancing, making it unsuitable for buy-and-hold strategies. Current market volatility and tech sector concerns create potential short-term opportunities, but long-term holders have historically suffered substantial losses.
Trailing returns across standard periods
Latest headlines on both assets
Schlumberger is the largest oilfield service firm in the world, with expertise in myriad disciplines, including reservoir performance, well construction, production enhancement, and more recently, digital solutions. It maintains a reputation as one of the industry's leading innovators, which has earned it dominant share in numerous end markets.
Read more on SLB →SQQQ is a leveraged inverse ETF that seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, that correspond to three times the inverse (-3x) of the daily performance of the Nasdaq-100 Index. It is a tactical trading tool designed for sophisticated investors to profit from or hedge against declines in large-cap technology and growth stocks. Due to its daily reset and the effects of compounding, it is intended for short-term use and carries significant risk if held during periods of high market volatility.
Read more on SQQQ →