Sherwin-Williams Company (The) Common Stock vs TeraWulf Inc — how do they compare? Sherwin-Williams Company (The) Common Stock trades at $325.43 (market cap $78.78B), while TeraWulf Inc trades at $10.67 (market cap $5.75B). The key difference: Sherwin-Williams Company (The) Common Stock is far larger — about 13.7× TeraWulf Inc's market cap, and Sherwin-Williams Company (The) Common Stock pays a 0.99% dividend while TeraWulf Inc pays none. Which is the better fit depends on your goals.
| SHW | WULF | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | $78.78B | $5.75B |
Volume | 1,403,311 | 57,657,081 |
Sector | Basic Materials | Financials |
52-Week High | $372.60 | $28.98 |
52-Week Low | $293.00 | $10.99 |
Enterprise Value | $92.71B | $8.37B |
Dividend Yield | 0.99% | — |
Typical Hold Time | — | 18 Days |
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
Sherwin-Williams (SHW) trades at $324.10, up 1.21% with strong earnings momentum after beating estimates for three consecutive quarters. The stock shows neutral technical signals but maintains robust fundamentals with 65.12% ROE and expanding manufacturing capacity. Recent facility expansions in Statesville enhance production capabilities, positioning the company for continued market share gains.
Outlook remains positive with analyst consensus at Buy (57.9%) and $383.64 price target, though high valuation multiples (P/E 29.9) and competitive pressures present risks. Earnings growth and strategic investments support upside potential, while margin compression and economic sensitivity warrant monitoring.
WULF trades at $13.21, down 1.2% today, with a bearish technical signal from moving averages but oversold RSI readings. The company reported a net loss of $661.42 million in 2025, with a negative net income margin of -1,179.94%, while revenue was $168.46 million. Analyst consensus is unanimously bullish with a $34.92 price target, and recent news highlights the company's pivot to AI data centers, driving investor interest despite financial losses.
The outlook is mixed: strong analyst support and AI infrastructure potential offer upside, but persistent losses, high valuation ratios, and negative cash flow from operations pose significant risks. Investors should weigh the growth narrative against fundamental weaknesses and sector volatility.
Trailing returns across standard periods
What Pluang investors did over the last 30 days
No sentiment data available yet.
Latest headlines on both assets
The Sherwin-Williams Company manufactures, develops, and distributes paints, coatings, and related products through three segments: Paint Stores Group, operating more than 4,900 company-owned stores selling Sherwin-Williams-branded products; Consumer Brands Group, selling brands such as Valspar, Dutch Boy, Krylon, and Minwax through mass merchandisers and home centers; and Performance Coatings Group, supplying industrial, construction, and transportation coatings in more than 120 countries.
Read more on SHW →TeraWulf develops, owns, and operates fully integrated digital infrastructure powered by predominantly zero-carbon energy. It utilizes a hybrid business model that combines industrial-scale Bitcoin mining with high-performance computing (HPC) and AI hosting, leveraging sustainable power sources like nuclear and hydroelectric to deliver low-cost, energy-efficient data center solutions.
Read more on WULF →