Compare Royal Bank of Canada (RY) vs VF Corp (VFC) Price & Performance
Price performance (Past 24H)
Key statistics
Key statistics
Royal Bank of Canada vs VF Corp — how do they compare? Royal Bank of Canada trades at $192.67 (market cap $262.99B), while VF Corp trades at $14.92 (market cap $5.71B). The key difference: Royal Bank of Canada is far larger — about 46.1× VF Corp's market cap, and Royal Bank of Canada pays the higher dividend (2.66%). Which is the better fit depends on your goals — on Pluang, investors hold Royal Bank of Canada for 47 Days and VF Corp for 64 Days on average.
| RY | VFC | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | $262.99B | $5.71B |
Volume | 1,016,377 | 8,987,330 |
Sector | Financials | Consumer Cyclical |
52-Week High | $217.87 | $21.55 |
52-Week Low | $143.64 | $12.62 |
Typical Hold Time | 47 Days | 64 Days |
Enterprise Value | $730.11B | $10.00B |
Dividend Yield | 2.66% | 2.48% |
Aura AI Summary
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
Aura AI Summary
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
Royal Bank of Canada (RY) trades at $191.22, down 2.61% on the day, amid a bearish technical signal. The stock shows strong fundamentals with consistent earnings beats, including Q2 2026 EPS of $3.07 versus $2.89 expected, and robust profitability with a 32.01% net income margin. Revenue growth accelerated to $66.53B in 2025, and the company maintains a solid dividend, with recent payouts of $1.76 per share. Analyst sentiment is mixed, with a Buy consensus of 43% but technical indicators pointing to near-term pressure.
RY presents a value opportunity with a reasonable P/E of 17.2 and strong ROE of 17.2%, supported by earnings momentum and strategic initiatives like global transaction banking integration. Risks include stretched valuations relative to peers, a high EV/EBITDA of 23.52, and macroeconomic sensitivity. The stock's current price near support at $189 suggests potential stability, but investors should weigh fundamental strength against technical bearishness and sector headwinds.
VFC trades at $14.38, down 0.48% on the day, with a mixed technical picture showing a bullish moving average signal but neutral oscillators. The stock is near its 52-week low, reflecting ongoing challenges. Recent earnings have been volatile, with two misses in the last three quarters, and the company reported a net loss of $189.72 million for 2025. Revenue has declined from $11.8 billion in 2022 to $9.5 billion in 2025, though 2026 projects a return to profitability.
The outlook for VFC hinges on executing its turnaround amid weak Vans performance. The stock's discounted valuation (P/E of 20.84, P/S of 0.6) offers potential upside if brand recovery gains traction, but high execution risk and competitive pressures pose significant threats. Analyst consensus is mixed with a Hold rating, and the stock faces near-term resistance at $15.
Returns comparison
Trailing returns across standard periods
Returns comparison
Trailing returns across standard periods
Investor sentiment on Pluang
What Pluang investors did over the last 30 days
Investor sentiment on Pluang
What Pluang investors did over the last 30 days
No sentiment data available yet.
About Royal Bank of Canada
Royal Bank of Canada is one of the two largest banks in Canada. It is a diversified financial services company, offering personal and commercial banking, wealth-management services, insurance, corporate banking, and capital markets services. The bank is concentrated in Canada, with additional operations in the U.S. and other countries.
Read more on RY →About VF Corp
VF designs, produces, and distributes branded apparel and accessories. Its largest apparel categories include action sports, outdoor, and workwear. Its portfolio of about a dozen brands includes Vans, The North Face, Timberland, Supreme, and Dickies. VF markets its products in the Americas, Europe, and Asia-Pacific through wholesale sales to retailers, e-commerce, and branded stores owned by the company and partners. The company has grown through multiple acquisitions and traces its roots to 1899.
Read more on VFC →
