Compare Ross Stores, Inc. (ROST) vs Trip.com Group Ltd (TCOM) Price & Performance
Price performance (Past 24H)
Key statistics
Key statistics
Ross Stores, Inc. vs Trip.com Group Ltd — how do they compare? Ross Stores, Inc. trades at $225.89 (market cap $73.25B), while Trip.com Group Ltd trades at $39.2 (market cap $26.04B). The key difference: Ross Stores, Inc. is far larger — about 2.8× Trip.com Group Ltd's market cap, and Ross Stores, Inc. pays the higher dividend (0.78%). Which is the better fit depends on your goals.
| ROST | TCOM | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | $73.25B | $26.04B |
Sector | Consumer Cyclical | Consumer Cyclical |
52-Week High | $255.23 | $78.96 |
52-Week Low | $144.67 | $39.19 |
Enterprise Value | $73.70B | $18.64B |
Dividend Yield | 0.78% | 0.42% |
Aura AI Summary
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
Aura AI Summary
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
Ross Stores (ROST) trades at $229.31, down 0.6% on the day, showing bearish technical signals despite strong fundamental performance. The company reported three consecutive quarterly earnings beats, with Q2 2026 EPS of $2.66 beating expectations by 36%. Revenue growth accelerated to 13% in Q2 2026, with comparable store sales surging 10% driven by increased traffic and margin expansion. The stock faces technical resistance near $234 while maintaining strong analyst support with a $271.33 consensus price target.
ROST presents a compelling growth story with robust fundamentals but faces near-term technical headwinds. The company's value-focused retail strategy resonates with cost-conscious consumers, driving consistent earnings outperformance. Key risks include competitive pressures in off-price retail and macroeconomic sensitivity. With 64% of analysts maintaining buy ratings and a 19% upside to consensus targets, the stock offers growth potential for investors comfortable with current technical weakness.
Trip.com (TCOM) trades at $40.50, down 1.29% with bearish technical signals despite strong fundamentals. The company reported robust 2025 results with $62.41B revenue and 53.34% net margin, though recent quarters show earnings misses. Valuation metrics appear attractive with P/E of 6.01 and EV/EBITDA of 3.21. However, the stock faces headwinds from a recent $770M Chinese antitrust penalty and declining cash flow trends.
The investment case balances deep value against regulatory risks. Analyst consensus remains bullish with $59.29 price target (47% upside), but technical weakness and China regulatory overhang create near-term uncertainty. Long-term growth prospects in travel recovery support the bull case, though investors should monitor Q2 2026 earnings due September 15 for confirmation of business momentum.
Returns comparison
Trailing returns across standard periods
Returns comparison
Trailing returns across standard periods
About Ross Stores, Inc.
Ross Stores is a leading American off-price apparel and home fashion retailer, operating over 1,920 stores (at the end of fiscal 2021) across the Ross Dress for Less and dd's Discounts banners. Ross offers a variety of name-brand products and targets undercutting conventional retailers' regular prices by 20%-70%. The company uses an opportunistic, flexible merchandising approach
Read more on ROST →About Trip.com Group Ltd
Trip.com is the largest online travel agent in China and is positioned to benefit from the country's rising demand for higher-margin outbound travel as passport penetration is only 12% in China. The company generated about 78% of sales from accommodation reservations and transportation ticketing in 2020. The rest of revenue comes from package tours and corporate travel. Prior to the pandemic in 2019, the company generated 25% of revenue from international business, which is important to its margin expansion. Most of sales come from websites and mobile platforms, while the rest come from call centers. The competes in a crowded OTA industry in China, including Meituan, Alibaba-backed Fliggy, Toncheng, and Qunar. The company was founded in 1999 and listed on the Nasdaq in December 2003.
Read more on TCOM →
