Rockwell Automation vs Under Armour Inc Class A — how do they compare? Rockwell Automation trades at $432.38 (market cap $48.21B), while Under Armour Inc Class A trades at $4.92 (market cap $2.07B). The key difference: Rockwell Automation is far larger — about 23.3× Under Armour Inc Class A's market cap, and Rockwell Automation pays a 1.27% dividend while Under Armour Inc Class A pays none. Which is the better fit depends on your goals — on Pluang, investors hold Rockwell Automation for 74 Days and Under Armour Inc Class A for 99 Days on average.
| ROK | UAA | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | $48.21B | $2.07B |
Volume | 953,342 | 12,050,442 |
Sector | Industrials | Consumer Cyclical |
52-Week High | $495.08 | $8.14 |
52-Week Low | $333.75 | $4.17 |
Typical Hold Time | 74 Days | 99 Days |
Enterprise Value | $51.34B | $3.05B |
Dividend Yield | 1.27% | — |
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
Rockwell Automation (ROK) trades at $432.61, down 2.1% on the day, with a bearish technical signal. The stock shows strong profitability with a 13.38% net income margin and 34.47% ROE, but trades at elevated valuation multiples including a P/E of 40.65. Recent earnings have consistently beaten estimates, and the company maintains a solid cash flow profile. Positive news highlights its leadership in industrial automation and digital transformation initiatives.
The outlook is mixed: analyst consensus is a Buy with a $489.89 price target, implying potential upside, but high valuation and near-term technical weakness pose risks. Key catalysts include continued execution on automation demand trends, while risks involve macroeconomic sensitivity and competitive pressures.
Under Armour (UAA) trades at $4.94, up 2.49% today, as the company navigates a challenging turnaround. Recent earnings show mixed results with Q2 2026 beating expectations but Q1 2026 missing, while technical indicators show a bullish trend despite negative profitability metrics. The company faces revenue declines but maintains margin improvement focus, with analyst consensus leaning toward Hold amid ongoing transformation efforts.
The outlook remains cautious with revenue weakness offset by cost discipline. Investment opportunity exists if margin gains translate to sustained profitability, but risks include persistent demand softness and high debt levels. Current valuation appears reasonable with P/S of 0.42, though negative ROE and net margins warrant careful monitoring of the brand transformation progress.
Trailing returns across standard periods
What Pluang investors did over the last 30 days
No sentiment data available yet.
Latest headlines on both assets
Rockwell Automation is a pure-play automation competitor that is the successor entity to Rockwell International, which spun off its former Rockwell Collins avionics segment in 2001. As of fiscal 2021, the firm operates through three segments--intelligent devices, software and control, and lifecycle services. Intelligent devices contains its drives, sensors, and industrial components, software and control contains its information and network and security software, while lifecycle services contains its consulting and maintenance services as well as its Sensia JV with Schlumberger.
Read more on ROK →Under Armour develops, markets, and distributes athletic apparel, footwear, and accessories in North America and other territories. Consumers of its apparel include professional and amateur athletes, sponsored college and professional teams, and people with active lifestyles. The company sells merchandise through direct-to-consumer, including e-commerce and more than 400 combined factory house and brand house stores, and wholesale channels. Under Armour also operates a digital fitness app called MapMyFitness. The Baltimore-based company was founded in 1996.
Read more on UAA →